Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:2
|
作者
Ghossein, Mohammed A. [1 ]
Van Stipdonk, Antonius Mw [2 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [1 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht CARIM, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht CARIM, Dept Cardiol, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Cardiol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; INTRAVENTRICULAR-CONDUCTION DELAY; DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION TRIAL; LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION; IMPROVE PATIENT SELECTION; LATERAL WALL ACTIVATION; HEART-FAILURE; ELECTRICAL DELAY; FOCUSED UPDATE; ESC GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.01.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a good treatment for heart failure accompanied by ventricular conduction abnormalities. Current ECG criteria in international guidelines seem to be suboptimal to select heart failure patients for CRT. The criteria QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) QRS morphology insufficiently detect left ventricular activation delay, which is required for benefit from CRT. Additionally, there are various definitions for LBBB, in which each one has a different association with CRT benefit and is prone to subjective interpretation. Recent studies have shown that the objectively measured vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies left ventricular activation delay with higher accuracy than any of the current ECG criteria. Indeed, various studies have consistently shown that a high QRS area prior to CRT predicts both echocardiographic and clinical improvement after CRT. The beneficial relation of QRS area with CRT-outcome was largely independent from QRS morphology, QRS duration, and patient characteristics known to affect CRT-outcome including ischemic etiology and sex. On top of QRS area prior to CRT, the reduction in QRS area after CRT further improves benefit. QRS area is easily obtainable from a standard 12-lead ECG though it currently requires off-line analysis. Clinical applicability will be significantly improved when QRS area is automatically determined by ECG equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 20
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relation between terminal QRS axis and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Koopman, Pieter
    Jehoul, Pieter
    Keskin, Mehmet
    Van Beveren, Jan
    Van Eyken, Jozef
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dilling, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    [J]. ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (01) : 88 - 89
  • [42] Number of Leads With Fragmented QRS Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Celikyurt, Umut
    Agacdiken, Aysen
    Sahin, Tayfun
    Al, Neslihan
    Kozdag, Guliz
    Vural, Ahmet
    Ural, Dilek
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [43] Relationship between vectorcardiographic QRSarea, myocardial scar quantification, and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Uyen Chau Nguyen
    Claridge, Simon
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Engels, Elien B.
    Razavi, Reza
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Chen, Zhong
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2018, 51 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [44] Myocardial contractile reserve as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response
    Sturdivant, JL
    Gold, MR
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (04) : 414 - 415
  • [45] A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Mollo, Roberto
    Cosenza, Alessandro
    Coviello, Ilaria
    Stazi, Alessandra
    Russo, Giulio
    Villano, Angelo
    Sestito, Alfonso
    Bencardino, Gianluigi
    Lanza, Gaetano A.
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (11): : 1615 - 1621
  • [46] Association of vectorcardiographic T-wave area with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Dural, Muhammet
    Ghossein, Mohammed A.
    Gerrits, Willem
    Daniels, Fenna
    Meine, Mathias
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):
  • [47] Differential Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes According to QRS Morphology and QRS Duration
    Dupont, Matthias
    Rickard, John
    Baranowski, Bryan
    Varma, Niraj
    Dresing, Thomas
    Gabi, Alaa
    Finucan, Michael
    Mullens, Wilfried
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (07) : 592 - 598
  • [48] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Narrow QRS
    Chapurnykh, A. V.
    Mochalova, O. V.
    Solovieva, N. V.
    Ryabov, A. S.
    Soloviev, O. V.
    Nazarov, D. E.
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIYA, 2011, 51 (09) : 82 - 88
  • [49] Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS
    Holzmeister J.
    Hürlimann D.
    Steffel J.
    Ruschitzka F.
    [J]. Current Heart Failure Reports, 2009, 6 (1) : 49 - 56
  • [50] QRS variation -index or percentage- to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Vasquez Quintero, Carlos J.
    [J]. CORSALUD, 2020, 12 (01): : 117 - 119