Validation of the surprise question in gynecologic oncology: A one-question screen to promote palliative care integration and advance care planning

被引:15
|
作者
Rauh, Lisa A. [1 ]
Sullivan, Mackenzie W. [2 ]
Camacho, Fabian [3 ]
Janke, Monica J. [2 ]
Duska, Linda R. [1 ]
Chandler, Chelsea [4 ]
Sukumvanich, Paniti [4 ]
Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine [4 ]
Lefkowits, Carolyn [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol,Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sc, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
OF-LIFE CARE; OVARIAN-CANCER; ILL PATIENTS; END; CONSULTATION; DISCUSSIONS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The "surprise question" ("Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?") has been shown to be predictive of 12-month mortality in multiple populations, but has not been studied in gynecologic oncology (GO) patients. We sought to evaluate the prognostic performance of the surprise question in GO patients among physician and non-physician providers. Methods. GO providers at two tertiary care centers were asked the surprise question about a cohort of their patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation. Demographic and clinical information was chart abstracted. Mortality data were collected at one year; relative risk of death at one year based on response to the surprise question was then calculated. Results. 32 providers (12 MDs, 7 APPs, 13 RNs) provided 942 surprise question assessments for 358 patients. Fifty-seven % had ovarian cancer and 54% had recurrent disease. Eighty-three (24%) patients died within a year. Patients whose physician answered "No" to the surprise question had a 43% one-year mortality (compared to 10% for "Yes"). Overall RR of 12-monthmortality for "No" was 3.76 (95% CI 2.75-5.48); this association remained significant in all provider types. Among statistically significant predictors of 12-month mortality (including recurrent disease and N2 prior lines of chemotherapy), the surprise question had the highest RR. Conclusions. The surprise question is a simple, one question tool that effectively identifies GO patients increased risk of 12-month mortality. The surprise question could be used to identify patients for early referral to palliative care and initiation advance care planning. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 758
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Surprise Question Is Not Correlated with Increases in Advance Care Planning Documentation
    Letellier, Teresa
    Holt, Christina
    Haskins, Amy
    Hutchinson, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (03) : 660 - 661
  • [2] The surprise question in gynecologic oncology: An analysis looking at end-of-life care in patients with gynecologic cancer
    Barton, W.
    Cohen, M.
    Raker, C.
    Luis, C.
    Cram, R.
    Mendez, H.
    McKnight, T.
    Parker, A. B.
    Lally, K.
    Robison, K. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 313 - 313
  • [3] The "surprise' question in paediatric palliative care: A prospective cohort study
    Burke, Kimberley
    Coombes, Lucy Helen
    Menezes, Antoinette
    Anderson, Anna-Karenia
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (02) : 535 - 542
  • [4] Early palliative care: the surprise question and the palliative care screening tool-better together
    Yen, Yung-Feng
    Lee, Ya-Ling
    Hu, Hsiao-Yun
    Sun, Wen-Jung
    Ko, Ming-Chung
    Chen, Chu-Chieh
    Wong, Weng Kee
    Morisky, Donald E.
    Huang, Sheng-Jean
    Chu, Dachen
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [5] An online international comparison of palliative care identification in primary care using the Surprise Question
    White, Nicola
    Oostendorp, Linda Jm
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Gerlach, Christina
    Engels, Yvonne
    Maessen, Maud
    Tomlinson, Christopher
    Wens, Johan
    Leysen, Bert
    Biasco, Guido
    Zambrano, Sofia
    Eychmueller, Steffen
    Avgerinou, Christina
    Chattat, Rabih
    Ottoboni, Giovanni
    Veldhoven, Carel
    Stone, Patrick
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (01) : 142 - 151
  • [6] THE SURPRISE QUESTION: AN EHR INITIATIVE TO FACILITATE PRIMARY PALLIATIVE CARE IN THE CICU
    Ushpol, Adam
    Parsons, Colby
    Golec, Sophia
    Frousios, Ritsa
    Tsega, Surafel
    Linker, Anne
    Ronquillo, Maria
    Gidwani, Umesh K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 2248 - 2248
  • [7] Using the 'Surprise Question' to Trigger Patients for Palliative Measures in Community Care
    Squire, Karina M.
    Bechtum, Elizabeth L.
    Henderson, Erin
    Larson, Kate
    Schreiber, Jen
    Thelen, Mary
    Ingram, Cory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E97 - E97
  • [8] The Surprise Question in Palliative Care: Does It Have a Role in Predicting Mortality?
    Davis, Mellar P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (03) : 292 - 293
  • [9] Validation of the "surprise question" in gynecologic oncology: Comparing physicians, advanced practice providers and nurses.
    Lefkowits, Carolyn
    Chandler, Chelsea
    Sukumvanich, Paniti
    Courtney-Brooks, Madeleine
    Duska, Linda R.
    Althouse, Andrew
    Kelley, Joseph L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (29)
  • [10] Using a Modified Surprise Question as a Tool to Improve Primary Palliative Care in a Neurocritical Care Unit
    Sinha, Shilpee
    Subramoney, Kavitha
    Fraser, Mark
    Howard, Joycelyn
    Sadowski, Josh
    Azar, Jose
    Kara, Areeba
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 47 (04): : 228 - 233