Using a Modified Surprise Question as a Tool to Improve Primary Palliative Care in a Neurocritical Care Unit

被引:1
|
作者
Sinha, Shilpee [1 ]
Subramoney, Kavitha [2 ]
Fraser, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Howard, Joycelyn [3 ,4 ]
Sadowski, Josh [3 ]
Azar, Jose [5 ]
Kara, Areeba [6 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Clin Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] IUSM, Clin Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] IU Hlth Acad Hlth Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] IUSM, Indianapolis, IN USA
[5] IUSM, Clin Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] IUSM, Clin Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; ICU; INTERVENTIONS; FAMILIES; PROJECT; HOSPICE; NEEDS; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.11.013
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Specialty palliative care is a limited resource. The surprise question ("Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?") is a screening tool for clinicians to identify people nearing the end of life. The researchers used a modified surprise question (MSQ) to improve primary palliative care in a neurocritical care unit. Methods: A palliative care physician attended interdisciplinary rounds up to three days a week and asked the primary neurocritical care team, for each patient admitted in the previous 24 hours, the MSQ: "Would you be surprised if this patient died during this hospital stay?" If the response was "No," the unit social worker identified the patient's surrogate decision maker (SDM), and the primary team was encouraged to conduct a goals of care (GOC) conversation. The frequency of SDM documentation, occurrence and timing of GOC conversations, and palliative care and hospice consultations were measured for the baseline six months before the intervention, and six months after. Results: Among 350 patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit during the study, the age, gender, prehospitalization presence of advance directives, and mortality were comparable between the baseline (n = 173) and intervention (n = 177) periods. Compared to the baseline period, there was a higher frequency during the intervention period of documentation of SDM (31.8% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.00002), all GOC conversations (35.3% vs. 53.1%, p = 0.008), GOC conversations conducted by the primary team (27.2% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.00009), palliative care consultations (11.6% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.004), and hospice consultations (2.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: The MSQ can be used as a tool to identify the risk of mortality, facilitate palliative care delivered by the primary team, and improve end-of-life care.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 233
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An online international comparison of palliative care identification in primary care using the Surprise Question
    White, Nicola
    Oostendorp, Linda Jm
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Gerlach, Christina
    Engels, Yvonne
    Maessen, Maud
    Tomlinson, Christopher
    Wens, Johan
    Leysen, Bert
    Biasco, Guido
    Zambrano, Sofia
    Eychmueller, Steffen
    Avgerinou, Christina
    Chattat, Rabih
    Ottoboni, Giovanni
    Veldhoven, Carel
    Stone, Patrick
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (01) : 142 - 151
  • [2] Early palliative care: the surprise question and the palliative care screening tool-better together
    Yen, Yung-Feng
    Lee, Ya-Ling
    Hu, Hsiao-Yun
    Sun, Wen-Jung
    Ko, Ming-Chung
    Chen, Chu-Chieh
    Wong, Weng Kee
    Morisky, Donald E.
    Huang, Sheng-Jean
    Chu, Dachen
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [3] Nurse-Led Use of Palliative Care Screening Tool to Enhance Care Delivery in an Inpatient Oncology Unit: Should the Surprise Question Be Modified?
    Hazeltine, Amanda M.
    Barton, Kelsea
    Nagpal, Vandana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2023, 65 (05) : E630 - E630
  • [4] Pediatric Perspectives on Palliative Care in the Neurocritical Care Unit
    Vermilion, Paul
    Boss, Renee
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2024,
  • [5] THE SURPRISE QUESTION: AN EHR INITIATIVE TO FACILITATE PRIMARY PALLIATIVE CARE IN THE CICU
    Ushpol, Adam
    Parsons, Colby
    Golec, Sophia
    Frousios, Ritsa
    Tsega, Surafel
    Linker, Anne
    Ronquillo, Maria
    Gidwani, Umesh K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 2248 - 2248
  • [6] Using the 'Surprise Question' to Trigger Patients for Palliative Measures in Community Care
    Squire, Karina M.
    Bechtum, Elizabeth L.
    Henderson, Erin
    Larson, Kate
    Schreiber, Jen
    Thelen, Mary
    Ingram, Cory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E97 - E97
  • [7] Telemedicine As A Medical Intensive Care Unit/Palliative Care Tool To Improve Rural Health Care
    Menon, P. R.
    Ramsay, A.
    Stapleton, R. D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183
  • [8] The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease
    Faraz Alizadeh
    Emily Morell
    Kevin Hummel
    Yunhong Wu
    David Wypij
    Danes Matthew
    Paul Esteso
    Katie Moynihan
    Elizabeth D. Blume
    [J]. Pediatric Cardiology, 2022, 43 : 1822 - 1831
  • [9] The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease
    Alizadeh, Faraz
    Morell, Emily
    Hummel, Kevin
    Wu, Yunhong
    Wypij, David
    Matthew, Danes
    Esteso, Paul
    Moynihan, Katie
    Blume, Elizabeth D.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (08) : 1822 - 1831
  • [10] Palliative Care Practice in Neurocritical Care
    Knies, Andrea K.
    Hwang, David Y.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2016, 36 (06) : 631 - 641