Content validity for dementia of three generic preference based health related quality of life instruments

被引:49
|
作者
Silberfeld, M
Rueda, S
Krahn, M
Naglie, G
机构
[1] Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Competency Clin, Dept Psychiat, Joint Ctr Bioeth, N York, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Collaborat Program Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Univ Hlth Network, Div Gen Internal Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Adm, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Div Gen Internal Med, Univ Hlth Network, Geriatr Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Care Res Program, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
aged; health state preference values; health status indicators; health values; patient preference; quality of life; reproducibility of results; utility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014406429385
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A semi-structured interview was conducted with dementia patients and their caregivers in order to explore which aspects of quality of life were perceived as relevant and important. These aspects of quality of life were compared with the content of three generic utility-based quality of life instruments: European Quality of Life Instrument, Health Utilities Index, and Quality of Well-Being (QWB) Scale. Twenty patients with mild dementia and 20 caregiver volunteers provided narrative data derived from interviews that were analyzed using a modified Grounded Theory method of analysis. Essential attributes of dementia quality of life identified by the respondents were missing in the three utility-based quality of life instruments selected for the study. Patients provided a wider range of attributes than the instruments including some attributes not described by caregivers. Of the three utility-based measures, the QWB scale included the largest number of quality of life attributes but still missed many. Compared to the respondent generated attributes all three utility-based quality of life instruments have important shortcomings in content validity.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Analysis of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments Measuring the Impact of Bariatric SurgerySystematic Review of the Instruments Used and their Content Validity
    Raed Tayyem
    Abdulmajid Ali
    John Atkinson
    Colin R. Martin
    [J]. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2011, 4 : 73 - 87
  • [12] A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Visual Disorders
    Tosh, Jonathan
    Brazier, John
    Evans, Philippa
    Longworth, Louise
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [13] MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD ANALYSIS OF THREE GENERIC PREFERENCE-BASED HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURES IN THE NATIONAL HEALTH MEASUREMENT STUDY
    Maglinte, G. A.
    Hays, R. D.
    Kaplan, R. M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A32 - A32
  • [14] MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN TUBERCULOSIS PATIENTS USING SPECIFIC AND GENERIC INSTRUMENTS
    Endarti, D.
    Zulaikha, H. U.
    Rachmawati, L.
    Trijayanti, C.
    Kristina, S. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S662 - S662
  • [15] Analysis of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments Measuring the Impact of Bariatric Surgery Systematic Review of the Instruments Used and their Content Validity
    Tayyem, Raed
    Ali, Abdulmajid
    Atkinson, John
    Martin, Colin R.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (02): : 73 - 87
  • [16] Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy
    Langfitt, J. T.
    Vickrey, B. G.
    McDermott, M. P.
    Messing, S.
    Berg, A. T.
    Spencer, S. S.
    Sperling, M. R.
    Bazil, C. W.
    Shinnar, S.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (05) : 899 - 914
  • [17] Validity and Responsiveness of Generic Preference-based HRQOL Instruments in Chronic Epilepsy
    J. T. Langfitt
    B. G. Vickrey
    M. P. McDermott
    S. Messing
    A. T. Berg
    S. S. Spencer
    M. R. Sperling
    C. W. Bazil
    S. Shinnar
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2006, 15 : 899 - 914
  • [18] Understanding and Assessing the Impact of Alcoholism on Quality of Life A Systematic Review of the Content Validity of Instruments Used to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Alcoholism
    Reaney, Matthew D.
    Martin, Colin
    Speight, Jane
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (03): : 151 - 163
  • [19] Quality of life of cancer patients: face validity and content validity of two instruments
    Spexoto, M. C. B.
    Serrano, S., V
    Maroco, J.
    Campos, J. A. D. B.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2013, 82 : 107 - 108
  • [20] Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures
    Khan, Kamran
    Mistry, Hema
    Matharu, Manjit
    Norman, Chloe
    Petrou, Stavros
    Stewart, Kimberley
    Underwood, Martin
    Achana, Felix
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)