Comparative analysis of endoscopic precut conventional and needle knife sphincterotomy

被引:7
|
作者
Jamry, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Dist Hosp Radomska, Dept Surg 2, PL-27200 Starachowice, Poland
关键词
Sphincterotomy; Endoscopic; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Complications; Hyperamylasemia; POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS; BILE-DUCT CANNULATION; RISK-FACTORS; RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; AMYLASE LEVEL; COMPLICATIONS; PAPILLOTOMY; EFFICACY; SAFE;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To compare the efficacy, complications and post-procedural hyperamylasemia in endoscopic pre-cut conventional and needle knife sphincterotomie. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of two pre-cut sphincterotomy (PS) techniques, pre-cut conventional sphincterotomy (PCS), and pre-cut needle knife (PNK). The study included 143 patients; the classic technique was used in 59 patients (41.3%), and the needle knife technique was used in 84 patients (58.7%). We analyzed the efficacy of bile duct access, the need for a two-step procedure, the rates of complications and hyperamylasemia 4 h after the procedure, "endoscopic bleeding" and the need for bleeding control. Furthermore, to assess whether the anatomy of the Vater's papilla, indications for the procedure or the need for additional procedures could inform the choice of the PS method, we evaluated the additive hyperamylasemia risk 4 h after the procedure with respect to the above mentioned variables. RESULTS: The bile duct access efficacy with PNK and PCS was 100% and 96.6%, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not significant (P = 0.06). However, the needle knife technique required two-step access significantly more often, in 48.8% vs 8.5% of cases (P < 0.0001). The only complication noted was post-ercp pancreatitis (PEP), which was observed in 4/84 (4.8%) and 2/59 (3.4%) patients submitted to PNK and PSC, respectively; the difference between the two procedures was not significant (P = 0.98). An analysis of other consequences of the techniques yielded the following results in the PNK and PCS groups: hyperamylasemia 4 h after the procedure > 80 U/L, 41/84 vs 23/59 (P = 0.32); hyperamylasemia 4 h after the procedure > 240 U/L, 19/84 vs 11/59 (P = 0.71); pancreatic pain, 13/84 vs 7/59 (P = 0.71); endoscopic bleeding, 10/84 vs 8/59 (P = 0.97); and the need for bleeding control, 10/84 vs 7/59 (P = 0.79). In the next part of the study, we analyzed the influence of the method chosen on the risk of hyperamylasemia with respect to an indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, papillary anatomy and concomitant procedures performed. We determined that the hyperamylasemia risk was increased by more than threefold [odds ratio (OR) = 3.38; P = 0.027] after PCS in patients with a flat Vater's papilla and more than fivefold (OR = 5.3; P = 0.049) after the PNK procedure in patients who required endoscopic homeostasis. CONCLUSION: PCS and PNK do not differ in terms of efficacy or complication rates, but PNK is more often associated with the necessity for a two-step procedure. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2227 / 2233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of biliary diseases after the failure of initial needle knife precut sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation
    Lo, Min-Hao
    Lin, Cheng-Hui
    Wu, Chi-Huan
    Tsou, Yung-Kuan
    Lee, Mu-Hsien
    Sung, Kai-Feng
    Liu, Nai-Jen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] Success and Complication Rates of Two Precut Techniques, Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy and Needle-Knife Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Cannulation
    Peng Wang
    Wei Zhang
    Feng Liu
    Zhao-Shen Li
    Xu Ren
    Zhi-Ning Fan
    Xiao Zhang
    Nong-Hua Lu
    Wen-Sheng Sun
    Rui-Hua Shi
    Yan-Qing Li
    Qiu Zhao
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2010, 14 : 697 - 704
  • [23] A prospective evaluation of post ERCP pancreatitis and precut needle knife sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation
    Bailey, Adam A.
    Kaffes, Arthur
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Lee, Eric
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB211 - AB211
  • [24] The efficacy and safety of needle knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography
    Kim, JS
    Bak, YT
    Kim, YH
    Kim, JG
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : A510 - A510
  • [25] Management of biliary diseases after the failure of initial needle knife precut sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation
    Min-Hao Lo
    Cheng-Hui Lin
    Chi-Huan Wu
    Yung-Kuan Tsou
    Mu-Hsien Lee
    Kai-Feng Sung
    Nai-Jen Liu
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [26] Success and Complication Rates of Two Precut Techniques, Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy and Needle-Knife Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Cannulation
    Wang, Peng
    Zhang, Wei
    Liu, Feng
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    Ren, Xu
    Fan, Zhi-Ning
    Zhang, Xiao
    Lu, Nong-Hua
    Sun, Wen-Sheng
    Shi, Rui-Hua
    Li, Yan-Qing
    Zhao, Qiu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (04) : 697 - 704
  • [27] Propensity score-matched analysis for comparing transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation
    Tabak, Fatema
    Wang, Fei
    Ji, Guo-Zhong
    Miao, Lin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [28] Propensity score-matched analysis for comparing transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation
    Fatema Tabak
    Fei Wang
    Guo-Zhong Ji
    Lin Miao
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [29] Is the Isolated-Tip Needle-Knife Precut as Effective as Conventional Precut Fistulotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation?
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Yang, Jae Kook
    Han, Su Jung
    Park, Suyeon
    Choi, Hyun Jong
    Lee, Yun Nah
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Cho, Young Deok
    GUT AND LIVER, 2018, 12 (05) : 597 - 605
  • [30] Post ERCP pancreatitis and precut needle knife sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective evaluation of the relationship
    Bailey, A. A.
    Kaffes, A. J.
    Lee, E. Y. T.
    Williams, S. J.
    Bourke, M. J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 : A294 - A294