Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs

被引:5
|
作者
Ratti, Gabriele [1 ]
Lelli, Davide [2 ]
Moreno, Ana [2 ]
Stranieri, Angelica [1 ]
Trogu, Tiziana [2 ]
Giordano, Alessia [1 ]
Grassi, Andrea [3 ]
Luzzago, Camilla [1 ]
Decaro, Nicola [4 ]
Paltrinieri, Saverio [1 ]
Lauzi, Stefania [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Vet Med & Anim Sci, Lodi, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, Dept Virol, Brescia, Italy
[3] I VET Srl, Lab Anal Vet, Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Vet Med, Bari, Italy
关键词
cats; diagnostic tests accuracy; dogs; immunological assay; serosurveillance; severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2; CORONAVIRUS;
D O I
10.1111/tbed.14716
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Serosurveillance among animals, including pets, plays an important role in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, because severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in animal populations could result in the establishment of new virus reservoirs. Serological assays that offer the required sensitivity and specificity are essential. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of three different commercially available immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets, namely two ELISA tests for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid [ID Screen SARS CoV-2 double antigen multispecies (Double antigen) and ID Screen (R) SARS-CoV-2-N IgG indirect ELISA (Indirect)] and one test for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding-domain [surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT)]. The obtained results were compared with those of conventional virus neutralization test (VNT), which was regarded as reference method. A total of 191 serum samples were analysed. Thirteen (6.8%) samples showed VNT-positive results. The overall sensitivity was higher for sVNT (100%) compared to nucleocapsid-based ELISA assays (23% for Double antigen and 60% for Indirect). The specificity was 100% for Indirect ELISA and sVNT, when a higher cut-off (>30%) was used compared to the one previously defined by the manufacturer (>20%), whereas the other test showed lower value (99%). The sVNT test showed the highest accuracy and agreement with VNT, with a perfect agreement when the higher cut-off was applied. The agreement between each nucleocapsid-based ELISA test and VNT was 96% for Indirect and 94% for Double antigen. Our findings showed that some commercially available serological tests may lead to a high rate of false-negative results, highlighting the importance of assays validation for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in domestic animals.
引用
收藏
页码:3530 / 3539
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical performance of different SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody tests
    Kohmer, Niko
    Westhaus, Sandra
    Ruehl, Cornelia
    Ciesek, Sandra
    Rabenau, Holger F.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (10) : 2243 - 2247
  • [22] Developing antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Petherick, Anna
    LANCET, 2020, 395 (10230): : 1101 - 1102
  • [23] Rapid Serological Tests for SARS-CoV-2: Diagnostic Performance of 4 Commercial Assays
    de Almeida, Sergio M.
    Spalanzani, Regiane N.
    Nogueira, Meri B.
    Sanada, Beatriz
    Cavalli, Barbara M.
    Rotta, Indianara
    Takahashi, Gislene R. A.
    Pereira, Luciane A.
    Moreira, Francielli B.
    Dino, Carolina L. T.
    Graf, Maria E.
    de Almeida, Bernardo M. M.
    Domino, Natalia R.
    Genelhoud, Gustavo
    Bochnia-Bueno, Lucas
    Raboni, Sonia M.
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2021, 30 (04) : 385 - 394
  • [24] Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Sethuraman, Nandini
    Jeremiah, Sundararaj Stanleyraj
    Ryo, Akihide
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (22): : 2249 - 2251
  • [25] Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Azzi, L.
    Maurino, V.
    Baj, A.
    Dani, M.
    d'Aiuto, A.
    Fasano, M.
    Lualdi, M.
    Sessa, F.
    Alberio, T.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 100 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [26] The Interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests
    Stites, Edward C.
    Wilen, Craig B.
    MED, 2020, 1 (01): : 78 - 89
  • [27] Comparison of the diagnostic performance with whole blood and plasma of four rapid antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Decru, Bram
    Van Elslande, Jan
    Weemaes, Matthias
    Houben, Els
    Empsen, Ine
    Andre, Emmanuel
    Van Ranst, Marc
    Lagrou, Katrien
    Vermeersch, Pieter
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (10) : E197 - E199
  • [28] Analytical performances of different diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 virus - A review
    Ravina
    Kumar A.
    Manjeet
    Twinkle
    Subodh
    Narang J.
    Mohan H.
    Sensors International, 2022, 3
  • [29] Large-scale study on virological and serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs in Spain
    Barroso-Arevalo, Sandra
    Barneto, Alberto
    Manuel Ramos, Angel
    Rivera, Belen
    Sanchez, Rocio
    Sanchez-Morales, Lidia
    Perez-Sancho, Marta
    Buendia, Aranzazu
    Ferreras, Elisa
    Carlos Ortiz-Menendez, Juan
    Moreno, Inmaculada
    Serres, Consuelo
    Vela, Carmen
    Angeles Risalde, Maria
    Dominguez, Lucas
    Sanchez-Vizcaino, Jose M.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2022, 69 (04) : E759 - E774
  • [30] Technical considerations to development of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Ernst, Emilie
    Wolfe, Patricia
    Stahura, Corrine
    Edwards, Katie A.
    TALANTA, 2021, 224