Measurement Properties of Questionnaires Measuring Continuity of Care: A Systematic Review

被引:67
|
作者
Uijen, Annemarie A. [1 ]
Heinst, Claire W. [1 ]
Schellevis, Francois G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van den Bosch, Wil J. H. M. [1 ]
van de Laar, Floris A. [1 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [4 ,5 ]
Schers, Henk J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; SELF-REPORT MEASURE; CARDIAC PATIENTS; HEALTH OUTCOMES; CANCER CARE; VALIDATION; COORDINATION; PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0042256
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Continuity of care is widely acknowledged as a core value in family medicine. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the instruments measuring continuity of care and to assess the quality of their measurement properties. Methods: We did a systematic review using the PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, with an extensive search strategy including 'continuity of care', 'coordination of care', 'integration of care', 'patient centered care', 'case management' and its linguistic variations. We searched from 1995 to October 2011 and included articles describing the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of instruments measuring one or more dimensions of continuity of care (1) care from the same provider who knows and follows the patient (personal continuity), (2) communication and cooperation between care providers in one care setting (team continuity), and (3) communication and cooperation between care providers in different care settings (cross-boundary continuity). We assessed the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using the COSMIN checklist. Results: We included 24 articles describing the development and/or evaluation of 21 instruments. Ten instruments measured all three dimensions of continuity of care. Instruments were developed for different groups of patients or providers. For most instruments, three or four of the six measurement properties were assessed (mostly internal consistency, content validity, structural validity and construct validity). Six instruments scored positive on the quality of at least three of six measurement properties. Conclusions: Most included instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties or the ability to measure all three dimensions of continuity of care. Based on the results of this review, we recommend the use of one of the four most promising instruments, depending on the target population Diabetes Continuity of Care Questionnaire, Alberta Continuity of Services Scale-Mental Health, Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic Review of Questionnaires Measuring Patient Satisfaction in Ambulatory Anesthesia
    Chanthong, Pratamaporn
    Abrishami, Amir
    Wong, Jean
    Herrera, Francisco
    Chung, Frances
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 110 (05) : 1061 - 1067
  • [42] Health related quality of life questionnaires in patients with hemophilia: a systematic review of their measurement properties
    Limperg, Perrine F.
    Young, Nancy L.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Price, Vicky
    Gouw, Samantha C.
    Peters, Marjolein
    Grootenhuis, Martha A.
    Abad, Audrey
    Blanchette, Victor
    Haverman, Lotte
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 56 - 56
  • [43] Measuring situation awareness in health care providers: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN methodology
    Chiman Ghaderi
    Roghayeh Esmaeili
    Abbas Ebadi
    Mohammad Reza Amiri
    Systematic Reviews, 12
  • [44] Measuring situation awareness in health care providers: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN methodology
    Ghaderi, Chiman
    Esmaeili, Roghayeh
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Amiri, Mohammad Reza
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [45] Measuring Resilience in Health Care Research: A scoping review of questionnaires
    Mulud, Zamzaliza Abdul
    Mohamad, Norfidah
    Nuwawi, Nurman Shah
    Sinaga, Sumiati
    ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2022, 7 (21): : 451 - 457
  • [46] Indices for continuity of care: A systematic review of the literature
    Jee, SH
    Cabana, MD
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2006, 63 (02) : 158 - 188
  • [47] Continuity of care in youth services: A systematic review
    Naert, Jan
    Roose, Rudi
    Rapp, Richard C.
    Vanderplasschen, Wouter
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2017, 75 : 116 - 126
  • [48] Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review
    Wei, Yifeng
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Hayden, Jill
    Kutcher, Stan
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 16
  • [49] Devices measuring transepidermal water loss: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Klotz, Tanja
    Ibrahim, Abdullah
    Maddern, Guy
    Caplash, Yugesh
    Wagstaff, Marcus
    SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 28 (04) : 497 - 539
  • [50] Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review
    Yifeng Wei
    Patrick J. McGrath
    Jill Hayden
    Stan Kutcher
    BMC Psychiatry, 16