Remediation of soils contaminated with toxic organic compounds.

被引:0
|
作者
Cole, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Decontamination or removal of soil that is contaminated with toxic organic compounds can be very costly, as illustrated by the values in Figure 1. In numerous situations, cleanup activities do not take place because the cost of clean-up may exceed the value of the property or dramatically decrease the willingness of the property owner to initiate remediation. Therefore, inexpensive, but effective, remedial methods are needed because the number of U.S. sites that are contaminated by toxic organic chemicals, toxic inorganic chemicals, or a mixture of the two is quite large. In addition to the nearly 1300 locations on the National Priorities List ("Superfund") and subject to RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) there are a much larger number of sites of smaller size that may pose a threat to adjacent populations. For example, Brown, et al. estimated that 75,000 to 100,000 or more of below-ground petroleum storage tanks were leaking. Glass, et al. (1995) estimated that, in the US alone, about 37,000 candidate sites for Superfund, 80,000 sites for RCRA, 1.5 million leaking underground storage tanks, and about 25,000 Department of Defense sites in need of remediation exist. Similar situations exist in developed countries of Europe and in less developed nations. In the U.S., sale of contaminated property is difficult or impossible, a situation which may lead to abandonment by the owner and lost opportunities to redevelop contaminated, but potentially very valuable, urban sites into productive uses. Long-term use of property for military operations has also resulted in contamination with organic solvents, petroleum hydrocarbons, and explosives. Wilson and Clarke (1994) estimated that remediation costs for NPL and RCRA sites alone could be as much as $750 billion, or an amount equal to the U.S. military budget for about 15 years. The cost estimate for European sites (including the European Union) is between $300 and $400 billion. At these costs, it is unlikely that more than a small fraction of the most critical sites will ever be remediated. One solution to the high cost of clean-up it to switch from expensive remedial methods to alternative methods that are significantly less expensive. On average, bioremediation is among the lowest cost methods for detoxification of soils contaminated with organic compounds (Figure 1) and composting is intermediate in cost among bioremediation technologies (Figure 2). When comparing the total budget for cleanup of a large site, the savings associated with use of bioremediation instead of chemical or physical based technologies give bioremediation an overwhelming monetary advantage (Table 1).
引用
下载
收藏
页码:175 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Remediation of contaminated soils and water with organic chemicals by means of natural, anionic and organic clays
    Cornejo, Juan
    Celis, Rafael
    FATE OF PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, : 355 - 368
  • [32] Permeameter desorption study on contaminated soils by organic compounds
    Park, J
    Lee, J
    Kwon, H
    WATER POLLUTION V: MODELLING, MEASURING AND PREDICTION, 1999, 1 : 525 - 534
  • [33] Water repellency of sandy soils: The role of hydrophobic organic compounds.
    Morley, CP
    Doerr, SH
    Douglas, P
    Llewellyn, CT
    Mainwaring, KA
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U927 - U928
  • [34] Organic compounds.
    Ewald, PP
    Hermann, C
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KRISTALLOGRAPHIE, 1928, 1 : 605 - 735
  • [35] Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils: A review
    Saichek, RE
    Reddy, KR
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 35 (02) : 115 - 192
  • [36] Surfactant-soil interactions during surfactant-amended remediation of contaminated soils by hydrophobic organic compounds: A review
    Laha, Shonali
    Tansel, Berrin
    Ussawarujikulchai, Achara
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [37] Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by organic acid extraction and electrochemical adsorption
    Yang, Xiong
    Liu, Lihu
    Tan, Wenfeng
    Liu, Chengshuai
    Dang, Zhi
    Qiu, Guohong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 264 (264)
  • [38] Role of biochar on composting of organic wastes and remediation of contaminated soils-a review
    Wu, Shaohua
    He, Huijun
    Inthapanya, Xayanto
    Yang, Chunping
    Lu, Li
    Zeng, Guangming
    Han, Zhenfeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (20) : 16560 - 16577
  • [39] Integrating Biochar, Bacteria, and Plants for Sustainable Remediation of Soils Contaminated with Organic Pollutants
    Xiang, Leilei
    Harindintwali, Jean Damascene
    Wang, Fang
    Redmile-Gordon, Marc
    Chang, Scott X.
    Fu, Yuhao
    He, Chao
    Muhoza, Bertrand
    Brahushi, Ferdi
    Bolan, Nanthi
    Jiang, Xin
    Ok, Yong Sik
    Rinklebe, Joerg
    Schaeffer, Andreas
    Zhu, Yong-guan
    Tiedje, James M.
    Xing, Baoshan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (23) : 16546 - 16566
  • [40] Environmental Restoration of Contaminated Sediment and Soils: The Role of Organic Amendments in PAH Remediation
    Beljin, Jelena
    Dukanovic, Nina
    Roncevic, Srdan
    Isakovski, Marijana Kragulj
    Maletic, Snezana
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2024, 10 (04): : 580 - 593