Assessment of reduced beam section (RBS) moment connections subjected to cyclic loading

被引:21
|
作者
Sofias, C. E. [1 ]
Pachoumis, D. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Xanthi 67100, Greece
关键词
Reduced beam section; Moment connection; Extended endplate connection; bolts; finite element analysis; Full scale experiments; Cyclic loading; TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106151
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The disastrous results of the "1994 Northridge" and the "1995 Kobe" earthquakes have shown that there was a poor level of seismic response in moment resisting frame buildings. These buildings were found to have developed limited ductility level, leading to brittle collapse. Extensive scientific research took place studying new design methods for steel connections, providing the acceptable post-elastic behavior for the steel joints and subsequently the desirable seismic response for the post-Northridge/Kobe steel structures. Reduced Beam Section (RBS) moment resisting connections are among the most economical and practical rigid steel connections that were developed, aiming to satisfy the above mentioned target. Although the RBS connection effectiveness was widely investigated using US design and construction practices, research data from European research exists only in the last decade. Recommendations of RBS applications in steel frames were prescribed in EC8, Part3, however the reliability of these recommendations is under consideration. This paper presents the experimental results of two specimens, where the RBS technique was applied. The extended endplate moment beam to column connection (widely applicable in European practices) is used under cyclic loading, and Finite Element Analysis was conducted in order to provide a safe assessment for the RBS application in European steel profiles. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Building retrofit with reduced web (RWS) and beam (RBS) section limited-ductility connections
    Tabar, Afshin Moslehi
    Alonso-Rodriguez, Andres
    Tsavdaridis, Konstantinos Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 197
  • [32] Cyclic-loading performance of steel beam-to-column moment connections
    Song, Z.S.
    Gu, Q.
    Guo, B.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2001, 22 (01):
  • [33] Construction joints in substandard beam-column connections subjected to cyclic loading
    Roy, Biswajit
    Laskar, Aminul Islam
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2020, 72 (08) : 379 - 391
  • [34] Nonlinear Numerical Assessment of Steel Reduced Beam Section Connections
    Bompa, Dan, V
    Bogdan, Teodora
    Elghazouli, Ahmed Y.
    Nunez, Edurne
    Eatherthon, Matthew R.
    Leon, Roberto T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2022, 2022, 262 : 252 - 260
  • [35] Experimental investigation of reduced beam section moment connections without continuity plates
    Pantelides, CP
    Okahashi, Y
    Reaveley, LA
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (04) : 1185 - 1209
  • [36] Behavior of RBS Beams Reinforced by Stiffeners Subjected to Cyclic Loading
    Kanao, Iori
    He, Tianrui
    Yu, Zheng
    Morisako, Kiyotaka
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [37] Effects of design factors on the cyclic response of sloped RBS moment connections
    Nia, Majid Mohammadi
    Moradi, Saber
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 207
  • [38] Cyclic loading of end plate moment connections
    Adey, BT
    Grondin, GY
    Cheng, JJR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2000, 27 (04) : 683 - 701
  • [39] Finite element analysis and experimental study on the behavior of reduced beam section connections of steel frame under cyclic loading
    Yu, You-Sheng
    Wang, Yan
    Liu, Xiu-Li
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26 (09): : 162 - 169
  • [40] Analytical Study On Modified Reduced Beam Section Connections Under Cyclic Behaviour
    Greeshma, G. S.
    Usha, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, SECON'19, 2020, 46 : 383 - 390