Gabapentin or pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults

被引:40
|
作者
Linde, Mattias [1 ]
Mulleners, Wim M. [2 ]
Chronicle, Edward P. [3 ]
McCrory, Douglas C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neurosci, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Dept Neurol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Psychol, Manoa, HI USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Durham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Durham, NC USA
关键词
ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; DOUBLE-BLIND; HEADACHE; GUIDELINE; TRIALS; MEDICATION; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD010609
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Some antiepileptic drugs but not others are useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by the variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. The present review is part of an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated (conclusions not changed) in 2007. Objectives To describe and assess the evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin/gabapentinenacarbil or pregabalin for preventing migraine attacks in adult patients with episodic migraine. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to 15 January 2013), MEDLINE In-Process (current week, 15 January 2013), and EMBASE (1974 to 15 January 2013) and handsearched Headache and Cephalalgia through January 2013. Selection criteria Studies were required to be prospective, controlled trials of gabapentin/gabapentin enacarbil or pregabalin taken regularly to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks, to improve migraine-related quality of life, or both. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. For headache frequency data, we calculated mean differences (MDs) between gabapentin and comparator (placebo, active control, or gabapentin in a different dose) for individual studies and pooled these across studies. For dichotomous data on responders (patients with >= 50% reduction in headache frequency), we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and numbers needed to treat (NNTs). We also summarised data on adverse events from all single dosage studies and calculated risk differences (RDs) and numbers needed to harm (NNHs). Main results Five trials on gabapentin and one trial on its prodrug gabapentin enacarbil met the inclusion criteria; no reports on pregabalin were identified. In total, data from 1009 patients were considered. One trial each of gabapentin 900 mg (53 patients), and gabapentin titrated to 1200 mg (63 patients) and 1800 mg (122 patients) failed to show a statistically significant reduction in headache frequency in the active treatment group as compared to the placebo group, whereas one trial of gabapentin titrated to 1800 to 2400 mg (113 patients) demonstrated a small but statistically significant superiority of active treatment for this outcome (MD -0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.55 to -0.05). The pooled results of these four studies (MD -0.44; 95% CI -1.43 to 0.56; 351 patients) do not demonstrate a significant difference between gabapentin and placebo. One trial of gabapentin titrated to 1800 mg (122 patients) failed to demonstrate a significant difference between active treatment and placebo in the proportion of responders (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.11), whereas one trial of gabapentin titrated to 1800 to 2400 mg (113 patients) demonstrated a small but statistically significant superiority of active treatment for this outcome (OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.09 to 7.17). The pooled results of these two studies (OR 1.59; 95% CI 0.57 to 4.46; 235 patients) do not demonstrate a significant difference between gabapentin and placebo. Comparisons from one study (135 patients) suggest that gabapentin 2000 mg is no more effective than gabapentin 1200 mg. One trial of gabapentin enacarbil (523 participants) failed to demonstrate a significant difference versus placebo or between doses for gabapentin enacarbil titrated to between 1200 mg and 3000 mg with regard to proportion of responders; there was also no evidence of a dose-response trend. Adverse events, most notably dizziness and somnolence, were common with gabapentin. Authors' conclusions The pooled evidence derived from trials of gabapentin suggests that it is not efficacious for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Since adverse events were common among the gabapentin-treated patients, it is advocated that gabapentin should not be used in routine clinical practice. Gabapentin enacarbil is not efficacious for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. There is no published evidence from controlled trials of pregabalin for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults.
引用
收藏
页数:52
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Migraine, Prophylactic Therapy ALD403 for Prophylaxis of frequent episodic Migraine
    Diener, H. C.
    AKTUELLE NEUROLOGIE, 2015, 42 (01) : E6 - E6
  • [32] The Impact of Migraine on Physical Functioning in Adults with Chronic and Episodic Migraine
    Kawata, A. K.
    Hareendran, A.
    Shaffer, S.
    Mannix, S.
    Sapra, S.
    Desai, P.
    Ortmeier, B. G.
    Lipton, R. B.
    Dodick, D. W.
    Stewart, W. F.
    HEADACHE, 2017, 57 : 162 - +
  • [33] Preventive Pharmacologic Treatments for Episodic Migraine in Adults
    Shamliyan, Tatyana A.
    Choi, Jae-Young
    Ramakrishnan, Rema
    Miller, Jennifer Biggs
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    Taylor, Frederick R.
    Kane, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (09) : 1225 - 1237
  • [34] Preventive Pharmacologic Treatments for Episodic Migraine in Adults
    Tatyana A. Shamliyan
    Jae-Young Choi
    Rema Ramakrishnan
    Jennifer Biggs Miller
    Shi-Yi Wang
    Frederick R. Taylor
    Robert L. Kane
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2013, 28 : 1225 - 1237
  • [35] Prophylaxis of episodic Migraine: Rapid efficacy and good Tolerability of Fremanezumab
    Foerderreuther, Stefanie
    FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2018, 86 (08) : 463 - +
  • [36] Erenumab (Aimovig) for Migraine Prophylaxis in Adults
    Shreiber, Alex M.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2019, 99 (12) : 781 - 782
  • [37] Update on guideline for migraine prophylaxis for episodic and chronic migraine from the Canadian Headache Society
    Medrea, Ioana
    Christie, Suzanne
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 455
  • [38] Pregabalin and gabapentin in multiple sclerosis
    Bittner, S.
    Hoehn, K.
    Goebel, K.
    Kleinschnitz, C.
    Wiendl, H.
    Meuth, S. G.
    NERVENARZT, 2011, 82 (10): : 1273 - +
  • [39] Switching from gabapentin to pregabalin
    McQuoid, Pauline
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (1491) : 101 - 103
  • [40] Oxadiazolone bioisosteres of pregabalin and gabapentin
    Wustrow, David J.
    Belliotti, Thomas R.
    Capiris, Thomas
    Kneen, Clare O.
    Bryans, Justin S.
    Field, Mark J.
    Williams, Dic
    El-Kattan, Ayman
    Buchholz, Lisa
    Kinsora, Jack J.
    Lotarski, Susan M.
    Vartanian, Mark G.
    Taylor, Charles P.
    Donevan, Sean D.
    Thorpe, Andrew J.
    Schwarz, Jacob B.
    BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2009, 19 (01) : 247 - 250