An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between needle biopsy rates and cancer detection rates in the English NHS Breast Cancer Screening Programme

被引:7
|
作者
Blanks, R. G. [1 ]
Given-Wilson, R. [2 ]
Alison, R. [1 ]
Jenkins, J. [3 ]
Wallis, M. G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Richard Doll Bldg,Roosevelt Dr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] St Georges Univ Hosp Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[3] Publ Hlth England, Breast Screening Programme, London, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge, England
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To examine the association between recall, needle biopsy, and cancer detection rates to inform the setting of target ranges to optimise the benefit to harm ratio of breast screening programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Annual screening programme information from 2009/10 to 2015/16 for the 80 screening units of the English National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (totalling 11.3 million screening tests) was obtained from annual (KC62) returns. Linear regression models were used to examine the association between needle biopsy rates and recall rates and non-linear regression models to examine the association between cancer detection rates and needle biopsy rates. RESULTS: The models show and quantify the diminishing returns for prevalent screens with increasing biopsy rates. A biopsy rate increase from 10 to 20 per 1,000 increases the cancer detection rate by 2.13 per 1,000 with four extra biopsies per extra cancer detected. Increasing the biopsy rate from 40 to 50 per 1,000, increases the cancer detection rate by only 0.25 per 1,000, with 40 extra biopsies per extra cancer detected. Although diminishing returns are also seen at incident screens, screening is generally more efficient. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing needle biopsy rates leads to rapidly diminishing returns in cancer detection and a marked increase in non-malignant/benign needle biopsies. Much of the harms associated with screening in terms of false-positive recall rates and non-cancer biopsies occur at prevalent screens with much lower rates at incident screens. Needle biopsy rate targets should be considered together with recall rate targets to maximise benefit and minimise harm. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of the concordance rates between core needle biopsy and surgical excision in patients with breast cancer
    Ricci, Marcos Desiderio
    Cabral Calvano Filho, Carlos Marino
    De Oliveira Filho, Helio Rubens
    Filassi, Jose Roberto
    Pinotti, Jose Aristodemo
    Baracat, Edmund Chada
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 58 (05): : 532 - 536
  • [22] Early detection of breast cancer and the impact of mammographic screening in survival rates
    Soares, Leonardo Ribeiro
    Freitas-Junior, Ruffo
    Oliveira, Jose Carlos
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2015, 20 (10): : 3285 - 3286
  • [23] Differences in colorectal cancer screening rates between breast cancer survivors and healthy controls
    Chait, Sari R.
    Jim, Heather
    Andrykowski, Michael
    Jacobsen, Paul
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2008, 35 : S161 - S161
  • [24] Breast cancer incidence as a function of the number of previous mammograms: Analysis of the NHS screening programme
    Corcos, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S88 - S88
  • [25] The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates
    Blanks, RG
    Bennett, RL
    Patnick, J
    Cush, S
    Davison, C
    Moss, SM
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [26] Large-scale breast cancer screening with mammography: High cancer detection rates combined with a low risk of benign biopsy
    Dean, PB
    Pamilo, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 10 - 10
  • [27] Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme
    Ciatto, S
    Ambrogetti, D
    Bonardi, R
    Catarzi, S
    Risso, G
    Del Turco, MR
    Mantellini, P
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2005, 12 (02) : 103 - 106
  • [28] Association between the social vulnerability index and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in Rhode Island
    Hwang, Jihwan
    Risica, Patricia Markham
    Lamy, Eric
    Goedel, William
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2024, 35 (08) : 1143 - 1149
  • [29] "Google It:" Relationship Between Google Searches on Colon Cancer Screening Tests and State-level Screening Rates
    Sutherland, Bryn L.
    Pribnow, Kaylee
    Browne, Jason
    Weiss, Jennifer M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S154 - S154
  • [30] A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme
    Blanks, RG
    Wallis, MG
    Moss, SM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (04) : 195 - 201