An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between needle biopsy rates and cancer detection rates in the English NHS Breast Cancer Screening Programme

被引:7
|
作者
Blanks, R. G. [1 ]
Given-Wilson, R. [2 ]
Alison, R. [1 ]
Jenkins, J. [3 ]
Wallis, M. G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Richard Doll Bldg,Roosevelt Dr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] St Georges Univ Hosp Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[3] Publ Hlth England, Breast Screening Programme, London, England
[4] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Cambridge Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge, England
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To examine the association between recall, needle biopsy, and cancer detection rates to inform the setting of target ranges to optimise the benefit to harm ratio of breast screening programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Annual screening programme information from 2009/10 to 2015/16 for the 80 screening units of the English National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (totalling 11.3 million screening tests) was obtained from annual (KC62) returns. Linear regression models were used to examine the association between needle biopsy rates and recall rates and non-linear regression models to examine the association between cancer detection rates and needle biopsy rates. RESULTS: The models show and quantify the diminishing returns for prevalent screens with increasing biopsy rates. A biopsy rate increase from 10 to 20 per 1,000 increases the cancer detection rate by 2.13 per 1,000 with four extra biopsies per extra cancer detected. Increasing the biopsy rate from 40 to 50 per 1,000, increases the cancer detection rate by only 0.25 per 1,000, with 40 extra biopsies per extra cancer detected. Although diminishing returns are also seen at incident screens, screening is generally more efficient. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing needle biopsy rates leads to rapidly diminishing returns in cancer detection and a marked increase in non-malignant/benign needle biopsies. Much of the harms associated with screening in terms of false-positive recall rates and non-cancer biopsies occur at prevalent screens with much lower rates at incident screens. Needle biopsy rate targets should be considered together with recall rate targets to maximise benefit and minimise harm. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall, biopsy and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme
    Blanks, Roger
    Wallis, Matthew
    Jenkins, Jacquie
    Alison, Rupert
    Wilson, Rosalind Given
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [2] An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme
    R. G. Blanks
    R. M. Given-Wilson
    S. L. Cohen
    J. Patnick
    R. J. Alison
    M. G. Wallis
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 3812 - 3819
  • [3] An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme
    Blanks, R. G.
    Given-Wilson, R. M.
    Cohen, S. L.
    Patnick, J.
    Alison, R. J.
    Wallis, M. G.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (07) : 3812 - 3819
  • [4] Correction to: An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme
    R. G. Blanks
    R. M. Given-Wilson
    S. L. Cohen
    J. Patnick
    R. J. Alison
    M. G. Wallis
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 7074 - 7075
  • [5] An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme (vol 29, pg 3812, 2019)
    Blanks, R. G.
    Given-Wilson, R. M.
    Cohen, S. L.
    Patnick, J.
    Alison, R. J.
    Wallis, M. G.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 7074 - 7075
  • [6] The impact of conversion to digital mammography on cancer detection and recall rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme: analysis of 11.3 million screening tests
    Blanks, Roger
    Wilson, Rosalind Given
    Alison, Rupert
    Jenkins, Jacquie
    Wallis, Matthew
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [7] Impact of Digital Mammography on Cancer Detection and Recall Rates: 11.3 Million Screening Episodes in the English National Health Service Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Blanks, Roger G.
    Wallis, Matthew G.
    Alison, Rupert
    Kearins, Olive
    Jenkins, Jacquie
    Patnick, Julietta
    Given-Wilson, Rosalind M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (03) : 629 - 637
  • [8] Calculating appropriate target cancer detection rates and expected interval cancer rates for the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme
    Moss, S
    Blanks, R
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [9] Survival rates from interval cancer in NHS breast screening programme
    Collins, S
    Woodman, CBJ
    Threlfall, A
    Prior, P
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7134): : 832 - 833
  • [10] The calculation of targets for the cancer and adenoma detection rates for the NHS bowel screening programme
    Blanks, Roger G.
    Moss, Susan M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2012, 19 (02) : 72 - 76