Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking

被引:5
|
作者
Alsop, James D. [1 ]
Mitchell, Julie C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biochem, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Math, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
protein-protein docking; mutagenesis; hot spot; molecular evolution; ortholog; interolog; HOT-SPOT RESIDUES; CONSERVED RESIDUES; BINDING; PREDICTION; IDENTIFICATION; ALIGNMENT; DATABASE; SERVER; SITES; EVOLUTIONARY;
D O I
10.1002/prot.24788
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Proteins are essential elements of biological systems, and their function typically relies on their ability to successfully bind to specific partners. Recently, an emphasis of study into protein interactions has been on hot spots, or residues in the binding interface that make a significant contribution to the binding energetics. In this study, we investigate how conservation of hot spots can be used to guide docking prediction. We show that the use of evolutionary data combined with hot spot prediction highlights near-native structures across a range of benchmark examples. Our approach explores various strategies for using hot spots and evolutionary data to score protein complexes, using both absolute and chemical definitions of conservation along with refinements to these strategies that look at windowed conservation and filtering to ensure a minimum number of hot spots in each binding partner. Finally, structure-based models of orthologs were generated for comparison with sequence-based scoring. Using two data sets of 22 and 85 examples, a high rate of top 10 and top 1 predictions are observed, with up to 82% of examples returning a top 10 hit and 35% returning top 1 hit depending on the data set and strategy applied; upon inclusion of the native structure among the decoys, up to 55% of examples yielded a top 1 hit. The 20 common examples between data sets show that more carefully curated interolog data yields better predictions, particularly in achieving top 1 hits. Proteins 2015; 83:1940-1946. (c) 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1940 / 1946
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues at protein-protein interfaces
    Keskin, O
    Haliloglu, T
    Ma, BY
    Nussinov, R
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 267A - 267A
  • [22] Recent Advances in Protein-Protein Docking
    Zhang, Qian
    Feng, Ting
    Xu, Lei
    Sun, Huiyong
    Pan, Peichen
    Li, Youyong
    Li, Dan
    Hou, Tingjun
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2016, 17 (14) : 1586 - 1594
  • [23] Clustering protein-protein docking predictions
    Tong, W
    Weng, Z
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 2999 - 3002
  • [24] Protein-protein docking with rosettadock.
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U220 - U221
  • [25] Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    STRUCTURE, 2016, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1829
  • [26] Progress in protein-protein docking approaches
    Li Chun-Hua
    Ma Xiao-Hui
    Chen Wei-Zu
    Wang Cun-Xin
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 33 (07) : 616 - 621
  • [27] Protein-protein docking predictions with RosettaDock
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 306A - 306A
  • [28] Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis by Docking
    Fink, Florian
    Ederer, Stephan
    Gronwald, Wolfram
    ALGORITHMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 429 - 436
  • [29] Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking
    Berchanski, A
    Shapira, B
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 56 (01) : 130 - 142
  • [30] Computer Vision for Protein-protein Docking
    Rudden, Lucas S. P.
    Degiacomi, Matteo T.
    Willcocks, Chris G.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 305A - 306A