Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity

被引:19
|
作者
Yurgil, Kate A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Golob, Edward J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] VA Ctr Excellence Stress & Mental Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Program Neurosci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Attention; N100; P300; P3a; Perceptual load; EEG; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DIVIDED ATTENTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; P300; COMPONENT; ERP COMPONENTS; TARGET DETECTION; P3A; SPAN;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12140
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study determined whether auditory cortical responses associated with mechanisms of attention vary with individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and perceptual load. The operation span test defined subjects with low versus high WMC, who then discriminated target/nontarget tones while EEG was recorded. Infrequent white noise distracters were presented at midline or +/- 90 degrees locations, and perceptual load was manipulated by varying nontarget frequency. Amplitude of the N100 to distracters was negatively correlated with WMC. Relative to targets, only high WMC subjects showed attenuated N100 amplitudes to nontargets. In the higher WMC group, increased perceptual load was associated with decreased P3a amplitudes to distracters and longer-lasting negative slow wave to nontargets. Results show that auditory cortical processing is associated with multiple facets of attention related to WMC and possibly higher-level cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1274
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Working Memory Task fMRI Connectivity: Reliability and Individual Differences
    Yuan, Dekang
    Hahn, Sage
    Juliano, Anthony
    Owens, Max
    Allgaier, Nicholas
    Chaarani, Bader
    Garavan, Hugh
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 91 (09) : S112 - S112
  • [32] Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity
    Edward T. Cokely
    Colleen M. Kelley
    Amanda L. Gilchrist
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006, 13 : 991 - 997
  • [33] Individual Differences in Visuospatial Working Memory Capacity and Distractor Inhibition
    Lecerf, Thierry
    Roulin, Jean-Luc
    SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 68 (02): : 67 - 78
  • [34] A CAPACITY THEORY OF COMPREHENSION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY
    JUST, MA
    CARPENTER, PA
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 99 (01) : 122 - 149
  • [35] Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity
    Cokely, Edward T.
    Kelley, Colleen M.
    Gilchrist, Amanda L.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (06) : 991 - 997
  • [36] Spatiotemporal repeatability of evoked potentials in an auditory oddball task over time
    Gilmore, Casey S.
    Puetz, Tim W.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Dishman, Rod K.
    Clementz, Brett A.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 43 : S42 - S42
  • [37] Auditory working memory predicts individual differences in absolute pitch learning
    Van Hedger, Stephen C.
    Heald, Shannon L. M.
    Koch, Rachelle
    Nusbaum, Howard C.
    COGNITION, 2015, 140 : 95 - 110
  • [38] Individual differences in auditory mismatch negativity, and its relationship to working memory
    Fulham, RW
    Burgess, D
    Fall, S
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 56 : 43 - 43
  • [39] Event-related potentials in an auditory semantic oddball task in humans
    Kotchoubey, B
    Lang, S
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 310 (2-3) : 93 - 96
  • [40] Auditory event-related potentials during a spatial working memory task
    Rader, S. K.
    Holmes, J. L.
    Golob, E. J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (05) : 1176 - 1189