Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity

被引:19
|
作者
Yurgil, Kate A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Golob, Edward J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] VA Ctr Excellence Stress & Mental Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Program Neurosci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Attention; N100; P300; P3a; Perceptual load; EEG; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DIVIDED ATTENTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; P300; COMPONENT; ERP COMPONENTS; TARGET DETECTION; P3A; SPAN;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12140
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study determined whether auditory cortical responses associated with mechanisms of attention vary with individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and perceptual load. The operation span test defined subjects with low versus high WMC, who then discriminated target/nontarget tones while EEG was recorded. Infrequent white noise distracters were presented at midline or +/- 90 degrees locations, and perceptual load was manipulated by varying nontarget frequency. Amplitude of the N100 to distracters was negatively correlated with WMC. Relative to targets, only high WMC subjects showed attenuated N100 amplitudes to nontargets. In the higher WMC group, increased perceptual load was associated with decreased P3a amplitudes to distracters and longer-lasting negative slow wave to nontargets. Results show that auditory cortical processing is associated with multiple facets of attention related to WMC and possibly higher-level cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1274
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lifespan age differences in cortical activity during an auditory oddball task
    Müller, V
    Werkle-Bergner, M
    Gruber, W
    Klimesch, W
    Brehmer, Y
    von Oertzen, T
    Li, SC
    Lindenberger, U
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) : 134 - 134
  • [2] Individual Differences in Working-Memory Capacity and Task Resumption Following Interruptions
    Foroughi, Cyrus K.
    Werner, Nicole E.
    McKendrick, Ryan
    Cades, David M.
    Boehm-Davis, Deborah A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (09) : 1480 - 1488
  • [3] Individual differences in working memory capacity predict performance on an associative learning task
    Baetu, Irina
    Burns, Nicholas
    Child, Brittany
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 53 : 82 - 82
  • [4] Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control
    Unsworth, N
    Schrock, JC
    Engle, RW
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2004, 30 (06) : 1302 - 1321
  • [5] Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity
    Yu, Ju-Chi
    Chang, Ting-Yun
    Yang, Cheng-Ta
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [6] Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration
    Tuholski, SW
    Engle, RW
    Baylis, GC
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (03) : 484 - 492
  • [7] Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
    Raghunath, Nisha
    Fournier, Lisa R.
    Kogan, Clark
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (05): : 1970 - 1985
  • [8] Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
    Nisha Raghunath
    Lisa R. Fournier
    Clark Kogan
    Psychological Research, 2021, 85 : 1970 - 1985
  • [9] Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Filtering
    Robison, Matthew K.
    Miller, Ashley L.
    Unsworth, Nash
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (07) : 1038 - 1053
  • [10] Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration
    Stephen W. Tuholski
    Randall W. Engle
    Gordon C. Baylis
    Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29 : 484 - 492