Construct and predictive validity of microanalytic measures of students' self-regulation of science learning

被引:34
|
作者
DiBenedetto, Maria K. [1 ]
Zimmerman, Barry J. [2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] CUNY Grad Sch & Univ Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Assessing self-regulated learning; Microanalysis; Using the microanalysis to assess the three phases of self-regulated learning; Construct and predictive validity of the microanalysis; Predicting self-regulated learning and science achievement; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.004
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
We sought to determine the construct and predictive validity of a microanalytic approach to capture the sub-processes within the three phases of self-regulated learning (SRL). Subprocesses included students' use of strategic planning, metacognition, task strategies, and self-evaluative standards. Fifty-one high school juniors were assessed as they read, studied, and were tested on a science passage. The results of the microanalytic measures were compared with the previously validated RSSRL Scale. Hierarchical regression revealed that microanalytic measures shared significant variance with the RSSRL In addition to this construct validity, the former measures displayed greater predictive validity of science learning. Regression revealed a linear increase in SRL among students from different achievement levels. Case studies of a student at each level demonstrated how the microanalysis can provide finely detailed information about SRL The results suggest that phase-linked microanalytic measures of SRL have potential diagnostic value for guiding instructional interventions in science. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 41
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of Design-Based Science on Students' Learning in Electrical Energy and Metacognitive Self-Regulation
    Tas, Yasemin
    Aksoy, Gokhan
    Cengiz, Ekrem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2019, 17 (06) : 1109 - 1128
  • [22] Is Self-Leadership Just Self-Regulation? Exploring Construct Validity with HEXACO and Self-Regulatory Traits
    Bailey, Sarah F.
    Barber, Larissa K.
    Justice, Logan M.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 37 (01) : 149 - 161
  • [23] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN SELF-CONCEPT MEASURES
    LOWNEY, F
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF PERCEPTION, 1975, 10 (02): : 15 - 19
  • [24] Teacher self-regulation: examining a multidimensional construct
    Capa-Aydin, Yesim
    Sungur, Semra
    Uzuntiryaki, Esen
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 29 (03) : 345 - 356
  • [25] Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model
    Hong, E
    O'Neil, HF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 36 (03) : 186 - 194
  • [26] Self-regulation of motivation: Contributing to students' learning in middle school
    Paulino, Paula
    Sa, Isabel
    da Silva, Adelina Lopes
    ICCSBS 2016 - THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE - SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES, 2016, 8 : 1 - 6
  • [27] Motivation and self-regulation - A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems
    Fulk, BM
    Brigham, FJ
    Lohman, DA
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1998, 19 (05) : 300 - 309
  • [28] Profiling Students' Self-Regulation With Learning Analytics: A Proof of Concept
    Liz-Dominguez, Martin
    Llamas-Nistal, Martin
    Caeiro-Rodriguez, Manuel
    Mikic-Fonte, Fernando A.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 71899 - 71913
  • [29] Resilience and self-regulation of learning in students of the first cycle of Psychology
    Katherine Tello-Quispe, Edith
    Pupo-Rodriguez, Raul
    Leyya-Areyalo, Doralis
    LUZ, 2021, 20 (02): : 113 - 128
  • [30] Teachers’ and Students’ Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning
    Michael J. Lawson
    Stella Vosniadou
    Penny Van Deur
    Mirella Wyra
    David Jeffries
    Educational Psychology Review, 2019, 31 : 223 - 251