Predictors of staff distress in response to professionally experienced miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal loss: A questionnaire survey

被引:57
|
作者
Wallbank, Sonya [1 ]
Robertson, Noelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Worcester, Worcester, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Sch Psychol, Leicester LE1 7LT, Leics, England
关键词
Neonatal death; Professional grief/loss; Psychological morbidity; Staff distress; WORK-ENVIRONMENT SCALE; JOB-SATISFACTION; PALLIATIVE CARE; EVENT SCALE; STRESS; NURSES; PATIENT; IMPACT; QUALITY; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.022
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Nursing and medical staff in maternity and gynaecological settings regularly care for patients experiencing miscarriage, neonatal death and stillbirth as part of their work. Qualitative reports have suggested that perinatal death takes a significant emotional toll on staff but to date, reported distress has not been quantified. Objectives: The present study, using Lazarus and Folkman's transactional model of stress, explored the extent of staff distress, and its predictive factors, in a sample of United Kingdom nursing and medical staff. Method: A retrospective, cross-sectional, questionnaire survey was undertaken across five Midlands hospitals, inviting a total of 350 doctors, nurses and midwives to participate. In addition to sociodemographics, the questionnaires assessed staff distress, coping strategies and their perception of working environment via the Impact of Events Scale (IES), Positive And Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), Brief COPE, and Work Environment Scale (WES) respectively. Results: 54% of eligible staff responded. IES scores revealed 55% of participants reporting subjective distress levels indicating a 'high' level of clinical concern. Multiple regression revealed that whilst no socio-demographic variable predicted distress, negative affect experienced at time of care (p=.002; Cl 0.164-0.683) negative appraisal of care given to the family (p=.003; Cl 0.769-3.358), cumulative number of losses experienced (p = 0.004; Cl 0.713-3.778), maladaptive ways of coping (p=.000; Cl 0.482-1.136), and staff perceptions of support outside work significantly predicted distress (p = 0.023; CI -4.818 to -0.355). Working environment, specifically lack of supervisor support, was significantly correlated with negative coping strategies (r=-0.242, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Staff working in these settings appear to experience significant levels of subjective distress, with appraisals of care and coping styles rendering staff more vulnerable. Formal training does not appear to be protective, however opportunity could be given to access support and supervision to mitigate distress and encourage reappraisal of care during which neonatal death has occurred. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1097
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [11] Alcohol use and mental distress as predictors of non-response in a general population health survey: the HUNT study
    Torvik, Fartein Ask
    Rognmo, Kamilla
    Tambs, Kristian
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (05) : 805 - 816
  • [12] Alcohol use and mental distress as predictors of non-response in a general population health survey: the HUNT study
    Fartein Ask Torvik
    Kamilla Rognmo
    Kristian Tambs
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2012, 47 : 805 - 816
  • [13] Time-course changes in mental distress and their predictors in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A longitudinal multi-site study of hospital staff
    Kameno, Yosuke
    Nishimura, Tomoko
    Naito, Yumi
    Asai, Daisuke
    Inoue, Jun
    Mochizuki, Yosuke
    Isobe, Tomoyo
    Hanada, Atsuko
    Enomoto, Noriyuki
    Yamasue, Hidenori
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (10):