A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia

被引:94
|
作者
McCutcheon, CA [1 ]
Orme, RM [1 ]
Scott, DA [1 ]
Davies, MJ [1 ]
McGlade, DP [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2006年 / 102卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000197777.62397.d5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The properties of dexmedetomidine (DEX) that result in titratable sedation and sympathetic modulation suggest that it would be suitable for use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under regional anesthesia. We performed a randomized, double-blind study in 56 patients having CEA under regional anesthesia and compared hemodynamic control using DEX versus a conventional sedation technique using midazolam and fentanyl standard (STD). Sedation was titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 2-4 in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of pharmacological interventions required to treat deviations of arterial blood pressure and heart rate outside of predetermined limits. We also compared recovery hemodynamic profiles, patient satisfaction, and adverse cardiac and neurological events. There was no difference in the overall rate of hemodynamic interventions (DEX 80% versus STD 79%; P = 1.0). However, the nature of interventions differed in that patients in the DEX group were less likely to require treatment for hypertension and/or tachycardia (DEX 40% versus STD 72%; P = 0.03). The number of interventions per patient for hypertension and/or tachycardia was also lesser in the DEX group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the numbers of patients needing intraoperative treatment for hypotension or bradycardia or in the need for intraarterial shunting. In the postanesthesia care unit, more patients in the DEX group required hemodynamic drug interventions (DEX 11, 44%, versus STD 4,14%; P = 0.03). These were primarily for hypotension (DEX 7,28% versus STD 3, 11%; P = 0.16). The number of patients requiring no additional pain relief in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly larger for patients in the DEX group (DEX 18, 72% versus STD 11, 38%; P = 0.027). DEX provides an acceptable alternative, without superiority to standard techniques for sedation during awake CEA.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 675
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Near Infrared Spectroscopy For Cerebral Hemodynamic Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy Under General Anesthesia
    Dalledone Siqueira Rein, Leticia Cristina
    Dalledone Siqueira, Daniel Emilio
    Guillaumon, Ana Terezinha
    Avelar, Wagner Mauad
    Cendes, Fernando
    [J]. OPEN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16
  • [22] The value of transcranial Doppler monitoring of cerebral blood flow changes during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia - A case series
    Gyongyosi, Zoltan
    Farkas, Orsolya
    Papp, Lorand
    Bodnar, Fruzsina
    Vegh, Tamas
    Fulesdi, Bela
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 13 (01) : 476 - 482
  • [23] Regional cerebral saturation versus transcranial Doppler during carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia
    Pugliese, Francesco
    Ruberto, Franco
    Tosi, Antonella
    Martelli, Sabina
    Bruno, Katia
    Summonti, Deborah
    D'Alio, Alessandra
    Diana, Beatrice
    Anile, Marco
    Panico, Antonietta
    Speziale, Francesco
    Pietropaoli, Paolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (08) : 643 - 647
  • [24] Comparison of simultaneous electroencephalographic and mental status monitoring during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia - Discussion
    Flinn, WR
    Nath, RL
    Ricotta, JJ
    Veith, FJ
    Leather, RP
    Sidawy, AN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 28 (06) : 1021 - 1023
  • [25] A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation
    Wu, Y.
    Zhang, Y.
    Hu, X.
    Qian, C.
    Zhou, Y.
    Xie, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 40 (04) : 419 - 425
  • [26] Quantitative comparison of leakage under the tourniquet in forearm versus conventional intravenous regional anesthesia
    Coleman, MM
    Peng, PW
    Regan, JM
    Chan, VWS
    Hendler, AL
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06): : 1482 - 1486
  • [27] The effects of music on anxiety and pain in patients during carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
    Kavakli, Ali Sait
    Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut
    Adas, Hilal Yavuzel
    Kudsioglu, Sefika Turkan
    Ayoglu, Raif Umut
    Ozmen, Sachk
    Sagdic, Kadir
    Yapici, Nihan
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 44 : 94 - 101
  • [28] Comparison of Complications after Revision Ulnar Nerve Surgery Performed under Regional versus General Anesthesia
    Dittman, Lauren E.
    Strother, Courtney R. Carlson
    Rhee, Peter C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2023, 15 (05) : 399 - 400
  • [29] Comparison between combined regional nasal block and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia with dexmedetomidine during endoscopic sinus surgery
    Hamouda, Moustafa Atef Moustafa
    Salama, Nahed E. E.
    Hassan, Samia A. A.
    Aboseif, Eman M. M.
    Abdelrazik, Rehab A. A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 39 (01): : 277 - 283
  • [30] General Anesthesia versus Sedation, Both with Hemodynamic Control, during Intraarterial Treatment for Stroke: The GASS Randomized Trial
    Maurice, Axelle
    Eugene, Francois
    Ronziere, Thomas
    Devys, Jean-Michel
    Taylor, Guillaume
    Subileau, Aurelie
    Huet, Olivier
    Gherbi, Hakim
    Laffon, Marc
    Esvan, Maxime
    Laviolle, Bruno
    Beloeil, Helene
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 136 (04) : 567 - 576