The Oblique Corridor at L4-L5 A Radiographic-Anatomical Study Into the Feasibility for Lateral Interbody Fusion

被引:20
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Tandon, Ankit Anil [3 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Spine, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, Singapore
[2] Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
lumbosacral region; psoas muscle; spinal fusion; spine; spondylosis; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003346
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional radioanatomical study. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence, size, and location of the oblique corridor (OC), and the morphology of the psoas muscle at the L4-L5 disc level. Summary of Background Data. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion via the OC has the advantage of avoiding injury to the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus. However, the varying anatomy of major vascular structures and the iliopsoas may preclude a safe oblique access to the L4-L5 level. Methods. Five hundred axial magnetic resonance images of the L4-L5 disc level were shortlisted. OCs were categorized into four grades: Grade 0 = no corridor, Grade 1 = small corridor (<= 1 cm), Grade 2 = moderate corridor (1-2 cm) and Grade 3 = large corridor (>2 cm). OC location was labeled as antero-oblique, oblique, or oblique-lateral. Psoas morphology was categorized based on a modified Moro's classification, where the anterior section was further subdivided into types AI-AIV. Oblique approach was considered nonviable either when there was no corridor due to vascular obstruction (Grade 0) or when the psoas was high-rising (Types AII-AIV). Results. 10.5% of the selected 449 patients had no measurable OC (grade 0) at the L4-L5 level. There were 35% and 37.2% patients with a grade 1and 2 OC, respectively. The location of the OC was anterior oblique, oblique, and oblique lateral in 3.7%, 89.6%, and 6.7%, respectively. According to the modified Moro's classification, 19.4% had a high-rising psoas. Predominantly, psoas was either in line with the disc (Type I; 30.7%) or low-rising (Type AI; 47.4%). Conclusion. Twenty-five percent of the patients did not have an accessible OC either due to obstruction by vascular structures or due to a high-rising psoas. Hence, proper evaluation of the relevant anatomy preoperatively is recommended for early adopters of this technique, as varying anatomy precludes universal suitability of oblique lateral interbody fusion for the L4-L5 level.
引用
收藏
页码:E552 / E559
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] L4/5 accessibility for extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a radiological study
    Valentin Quack
    Jörg Eschweiler
    Christina Prechtel
    Filippo Migliorini
    Marcel Betsch
    Nicola Maffulli
    Natalia Gutteck
    Markus Tingart
    Philipp Kobbe
    Miguel Pishnamaz
    Frank Hildebrand
    Dariusch Arbab
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [32] L4/5 accessibility for extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a radiological study
    Quack, Valentin
    Eschweiler, Joerg
    Prechtel, Christina
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Betsch, Marcel
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Gutteck, Natalia
    Tingart, Markus
    Kobbe, Philipp
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Arbab, Dariusch
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [33] Particularities of anterior fusion in L4-L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis
    Moreau, P. -E.
    Flouzat-Lachaniette, C. -H.
    Lebhar, J.
    Mirouse, G.
    Poignard, A.
    Allain, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (06) : 755 - 758
  • [34] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 has a low rate of complications in appropriately selected patients when using a standardized surgical technique
    Buckland, A. J.
    Huynh, N., V
    Menezes, C. M.
    Cheng, I.
    Kwon, B.
    Protopsaltis, T.
    Braly, B. A.
    Thomas, J. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (01): : 53 - 61
  • [35] Laparoscopic spinal fusion of L4-L5 and L5-S1
    B.P. Geerdes
    C.hW.G.M. Geukers
    W.F.M. van Erp
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2001, 15 (11) : 1308 - 1312
  • [36] Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4/5: Management of the Transitional Psoas
    Ohiorhenuan, Ifije E.
    Martirosyan, Nikolay L.
    Wewel, Joshua T.
    Sagar, Soumya
    Uribe, Juan S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 148 : E192 - E196
  • [37] Oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5-S1: feasibility, surgical approach window, incision line, and influencing factors
    Nayak, Rusheel
    Razzouk, Jacob
    Ramos, Omar
    Mehta, Shaurya
    Harianja, Gideon
    Wycliffe, Nathaniel
    Danisa, Olumide
    Cheng, Wayne
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (07) : 2604 - 2610
  • [38] Anatomical Study of the Lumbar Segmental Arteries in Relation to the Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Approach
    Wu, Tianliang
    Xiao, Liang
    Liu, Chen
    Tao, Xiuxia
    Xu, Hongguang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 138 : E778 - E786
  • [39] Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Lumbar Plexus at the L4-L5 Disc Development of a Preoperative Surgical Planning Tool for Lateral Lumbar Transpsoas Interbody Fusion (LLIF)
    Quinn, John C.
    Fruauff, Kristen
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Giambrone, Ashley
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Gupta, Ajay
    Chazen, J. Levi
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (12) : 942 - 947
  • [40] Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5
    Ko, Myeong Jin
    Park, Seung Won
    Kim, Young Baeg
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 62 (04) : 422 - 431