The Oblique Corridor at L4-L5 A Radiographic-Anatomical Study Into the Feasibility for Lateral Interbody Fusion

被引:20
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Kaliya-Perumal, Arun-Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Tandon, Ankit Anil [3 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Spine, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433, Singapore
[2] Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
lumbosacral region; psoas muscle; spinal fusion; spine; spondylosis; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003346
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional radioanatomical study. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence, size, and location of the oblique corridor (OC), and the morphology of the psoas muscle at the L4-L5 disc level. Summary of Background Data. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion via the OC has the advantage of avoiding injury to the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus. However, the varying anatomy of major vascular structures and the iliopsoas may preclude a safe oblique access to the L4-L5 level. Methods. Five hundred axial magnetic resonance images of the L4-L5 disc level were shortlisted. OCs were categorized into four grades: Grade 0 = no corridor, Grade 1 = small corridor (<= 1 cm), Grade 2 = moderate corridor (1-2 cm) and Grade 3 = large corridor (>2 cm). OC location was labeled as antero-oblique, oblique, or oblique-lateral. Psoas morphology was categorized based on a modified Moro's classification, where the anterior section was further subdivided into types AI-AIV. Oblique approach was considered nonviable either when there was no corridor due to vascular obstruction (Grade 0) or when the psoas was high-rising (Types AII-AIV). Results. 10.5% of the selected 449 patients had no measurable OC (grade 0) at the L4-L5 level. There were 35% and 37.2% patients with a grade 1and 2 OC, respectively. The location of the OC was anterior oblique, oblique, and oblique lateral in 3.7%, 89.6%, and 6.7%, respectively. According to the modified Moro's classification, 19.4% had a high-rising psoas. Predominantly, psoas was either in line with the disc (Type I; 30.7%) or low-rising (Type AI; 47.4%). Conclusion. Twenty-five percent of the patients did not have an accessible OC either due to obstruction by vascular structures or due to a high-rising psoas. Hence, proper evaluation of the relevant anatomy preoperatively is recommended for early adopters of this technique, as varying anatomy precludes universal suitability of oblique lateral interbody fusion for the L4-L5 level.
引用
收藏
页码:E552 / E559
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Oblique Corridor at L4-L5: A Radiographic-Anatomical Study Into the Feasibility for Lateral Interbody Fusion (vol 45, pg E552, 2020)
    Ng, JP-H
    Kaliya-Perumal, A-K
    Tandon, A. A.
    Oh, JY-L
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (15) : E977 - E977
  • [2] L4-L5 anatomy classification system for lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Amaral, Rodrigo
    Pokorny, Gabriel
    Alvernia, Jorge E.
    Pimenta, Luiz
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [3] An Expanded Surgical Corridor of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4-5: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    Praisarnti, Pakawas
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Prasertkul, Natavut
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Singhatanadgige, Weerasak
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (04) : 1450 - 1456
  • [4] Spondylolisthesis with Uncommon Congenital Deformity of L4-L5 Vertebral Fusion Treated by Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Cheng, Cheng
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Can
    Wu, Hao
    Jian, Feng-zeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : 222 - 226
  • [5] Does L4-L5 Pose Additional Neurologic Risk in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Salzmann, Stephan N.
    Shirahata, Toshiyuki
    Okano, Ichiro
    Winter, Fabian
    Sax, Oliver C.
    Yang, Jingyan
    Shue, Jennifer
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Girard, Federico P.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 129 : E337 - E342
  • [6] Anatomical Feasibility of Right Oblique Approach for L5-S1 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Song, Se-Jin
    Shin, Myung-Hoon
    Kim, Jong-Tae
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 132 : E403 - E408
  • [7] Factors Affecting Cage Obliquity and the Relationship between Cage Obliquity and Radiological Outcomes in Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at the L4-L5 Level
    Jang, Cheolwon
    Hwang, Sunghwan
    Jin, Tae Kyung
    Shin, Hyung Jin
    Cho, Byung-Kyu
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 66 (06) : 703 - 715
  • [8] Single-Position Prone Transpsoas Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4-L5: Technical Pearls
    Choy, Winward
    Serur, Ximena
    Giraldo, Juan P.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S3 - S8
  • [9] Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Hayashi, Hiroyuki
    Murakami, Hideki
    Demura, Satoru
    Kato, Satoshi
    Kawahara, Norio
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 49 (03) : 284 - 288
  • [10] Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Hiroyuki Hayashi
    Hideki Murakami
    Satoru Demura
    Satoshi Kato
    Norio Kawahara
    Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2015, 49 : 284 - 288