Fuzzy preferences in conflicts

被引:37
|
作者
Al-Mutairi, Mubarak S. [2 ]
Hipel, Keith W. [1 ]
Kamel, Mohamed S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Hafr Albatin Community Coll, Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
environmental conflict; fuzzy sets; Graph Model for Conflict Resolution; preferences; multiple participants;
D O I
10.1007/s11518-008-5088-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A systematic fuzzy approach is developed to model fuzziness and uncertainties in the preferences of decision makers involved in a conflict. This unique fuzzy preference formulation is used within the paradigm of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution in which a given dispute is modeled in terms of decision makers, each decision maker's courses of actions or options, and each decision maker's preferences concerning the states or outcomes which could take place. In order to be able to determine the stability of each state for each decision maker and the possible equilibria or resolutions, a range of solution concepts describing potential human behavior under. conflict are defined for use with fuzzy preferences. More specifically, strong and weak definitions of stability are provided for the solution concepts called Nash, general metarational, symmetric metarational, and sequential stability. To illustrate how these solution concepts can be conveniently used in practice, they are applied to a dispute over the contamination of an aquifer by a chemical company located in Elmira, Ontario, Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 276
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring Users' Preferences in a Fuzzy Setting
    Glodeanu, Cynthia Vera
    [J]. ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 303 (303) : 37 - 57
  • [32] Learning Fuzzy SPARQL User Preferences
    Slama, Olfa
    Yazidi, Anis
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2019), 2019, : 1457 - 1462
  • [33] ON CHOOSING RATIONALLY WHEN PREFERENCES ARE FUZZY
    BARRETT, CR
    PATTANAIK, PK
    SALLES, M
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1990, 34 (02) : 197 - 212
  • [34] FUZZY PREFERENCES IN LINEAR-PROGRAMMING
    RAMIK, J
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1991, 368 : 49 - 58
  • [35] Social choice, fuzzy preferences and manipulations
    Perote-Pena, Juan
    Piggins, Ashley
    [J]. ECONOMICS, RATIONAL CHOICE AND NORMATIVE PHILOSOPHY, 2009, 116 : 95 - 110
  • [36] Modeling Fuzzy and Interval Fuzzy Preferences Within a Graph Model Framework
    Bashar, M. Abul
    Obeidi, Amer
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 24 (04) : 765 - 778
  • [37] Hesitant fuzzy programming technique for multidimensional analysis of hesitant fuzzy preferences
    Xiaolu Zhang
    Zeshui Xu
    Xiaoming Xing
    [J]. OR Spectrum, 2016, 38 : 789 - 817
  • [38] Decomposition of Fuzzy Relations: An Application to the Definition, Construction and Analysis of Fuzzy Preferences
    Campion, Maria Jesus
    Indurain, Esteban
    Raventos-Pujol, Armajac
    [J]. AXIOMS, 2023, 12 (12)
  • [39] HANDLING CONFLICTS IN FUZZY MULTIPLE-CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION
    CARLSSON, C
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1984, 229 : 31 - 40
  • [40] Hesitant fuzzy programming technique for multidimensional analysis of hesitant fuzzy preferences
    Zhang, Xiaolu
    Xu, Zeshui
    Xing, Xiaoming
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2016, 38 (03) : 789 - 817