Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study

被引:3
|
作者
Beretta, Mario [1 ]
Maiorana, Carlo [1 ]
Manfredini, Mattia [1 ]
Signorino, Fabrizio [1 ]
Poli, Pier Paolo [1 ]
Vinci, Raffaele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Implant Ctr Edentulism & Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surg & Odontostomatol Unit, Via Commenda 10, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Dept Dent, I-20132 Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; Socket preservation; Tooth loss; Mucograft-seal; RIDGE PRESERVATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; GRAFTING MATERIALS; MEMBRANE; TRIAL; AUGMENTATION; METAANALYSIS; XENOGRAFT; WOUNDS; WIDTH;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-020-01367-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The present study evaluated the clinical and radiological stability of hard and soft tissues following alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedure with a follow-up of 5 year from implant insertion. Materials and methods The initial sample consisted of seven patients who underwent single tooth extraction and ASP procedure by means of demineralized bovine bone mineral particles covered with a porcine-derived non-cross-linked collagen matrix (CM). Each patient received a submerged single implant in the healed site. Mesial and distal peri-implant marginal bone resorption (MBR) rates were assessed radiographically at 1 year (T-1) and 5 years (T-2) after implant placement (baseline value). Results and Statistics No dropouts occurred up to 5 years. AtT1, the MBR was 0.08 +/- 0.16 mm at the mesial aspect and 0.1 +/- 0.12 mm at the distal aspect. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.867). AtT2, the mesial MBR was 0.15 +/- 0.17 mm and the distal MBR was 0.11 +/- 0.14 mm, with a non-statistically significant difference (P = 0.532). Therefore, no statistically significant differences were detected comparing mesial and distal MBR at any time point. With respect to the intra-group comparisons, no differences were observed comparing the different study periods within each variable. Indeed, the comparison betweenT(0),T(1)andT(2)was non-statistically significant at both mesial (P = 0.06) and distal (P = 0.06) aspects. After 5 years, the volume of the soft tissues appeared clinically well maintained with a natural aspect around dental implants and adjacent teeth. Conclusion ASP using demineralized bovine bone mineral in combination with CM proved to be an effective technique to maintain stable dimensional volumes of both hard and soft tissues.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bone resorption around the annular closure device during a postoperative follow-up of 8 years
    Abdugafur Sanginov
    Aleksandr Krutko
    Olga Leonova
    Alexey Peleganchuk
    [J]. Acta Neurochirurgica, 166
  • [22] Bone resorption around the annular closure device during a postoperative follow-up of 8 years
    Sanginov, Abdugafur
    Krutko, Aleksandr
    Leonova, Olga
    Peleganchuk, Alexey
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [23] Marginal bone level changes around dental implants with one or two adjacent teeth - A clinical and radiographic retrospective study with a follow up of at least 10 years
    Weigel, Lucienne D.
    Scherrer, Angelina
    Schmid, Lucas
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (08) : 872 - 880
  • [24] Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implants placed by means of inferior alveolar nerve lateralization: a 5-year follow-up study
    Martinez-Rodriguez, Natalia
    Barona-Dorado, Cristina
    Cortes-Breton Brinkmann, Jorge
    Martin Ares, Maria
    Luis Calvo-Guirado, Jose
    Maria Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (07) : 779 - 784
  • [25] Effect of Photobiomodulation on Bone Formation Around Dental Implants Placed in Overprepared Sites: Micro CT Scan Study
    Xailani, Kocher Kareem
    Hamad, Shehab Ahmed
    [J]. BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2023, 45 (03) : 1695 - 1699
  • [26] Risk indicators for marginal bone resorption around implants in function for at least 4 years: A retrospective longitudinal study
    Mameno, Tomoaki
    Wada, Masahiro
    Otsuki, Motohiro
    Okuno, Ikuhisa
    Ozeki, Kenji
    Tahara, Akihiko
    Ikebe, Kazunori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 91 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [27] Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up
    Schwartz-Arad, D
    Mardinger, O
    Levin, L
    Kozlovsky, A
    Hirshberg, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2005, 20 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [28] Effect of Microthread Design on Marginal Bone Level Around Dental Implants Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets
    Khorsand, Afshin
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi, Amir Alireza
    Naddafpour, Nima
    Shayesteh, Yadollah Soleimani
    Khojasteh, Arash
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [29] Study of Immediate Implants Placed in Mandibular Alveolar Bone Reconstructed with Screw-Guided Bone Regeneration Technique: A 24-Months Follow-Up
    Toeroek, Bianca
    Toeroek, Roland
    Dohan Ehrenfest, David M.
    Agop-Forna, Doriana
    Dascalu, Cristina
    Forna, Norina Consuela
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (13):
  • [30] Radiographic and clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge preserved sites: a 12-month post-loading follow-up
    Patel, K.
    Mardas, N.
    Donos, N.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (06) : 599 - 605