Monitoring of cyanobacteria for water quality: doing the necessary right or wrong?

被引:13
|
作者
Moustaka-Gouni, M. [1 ]
Sommer, U. [2 ]
Katsiapi, M. [1 ]
Vardaka, E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Biol, Dept Bot, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] GEOMAR Helmholtz Ctr Ocean Res Kiel, Dusternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[3] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Nutr Sci & Dietet, GR-57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Cyanodictyon imperfectum; euphotic zone; Greece; Merismopedia tenuissima; Secchi depth; Water Framework Directive; WFD; TRANSPARENT EXOPOLYMER PARTICLES; PLANKTOTHRIX-RUBESCENS; MICROCYSTIS-AERUGINOSA; SECCHI DISK; LAKE; PHYTOPLANKTON; BLOOMS; ZOOPLANKTON; VARIABILITY; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1071/MF18381
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Cyanobacteria are an essential biological component of phytoplankton water quality assessment. However, there are some problems associated with the widely used everyday practices of sampling, estimation and use of cyanobacteria when calculating phytoplankton indices assessing water quality. Many indices were developed during the implementation of the Water Framework Directive, considered the most innovative European environmental legislation. Most indices include cyanobacteria as a composition or bloom metric. Problems with the indices concern the exclusion of most chroococcalean taxa from cyanobacterial biovolume estimations in lakes and reservoirs of the Mediterranean region, treatment of the mucilage of colonial chroococcalean taxa in biovolume estimations and overlooking of deep-water cyanobacterial blooms due to sampling depth. These problems may lead to a biased view of water quality. In this paper we argue in favour of including all cyanobacteria taxa and their mucilage in biovolume estimations and considering a sampling depth that covers deep-water maxima, such as those formed by Planktothrix rubescens or colonial chroococcalean taxa.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 724
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Doing Right by Our Patients When Things Go Wrong in the Ambulatory Setting
    Schiff, Gordon
    Griswold, Paula
    Ellis, Bonnie R.
    Puopolo, Ann Louise
    Brede, Namara
    Nieva, Harry Reyes
    Federico, Frank
    Leydon, Nicholas
    Ling, Judy
    Wachenheim, Deborah
    Leape, Lucian L.
    Biondolillo, Madeleine
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2014, 40 (02): : 91 - +
  • [32] DOING THE RIGHT THING - QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE ELDERLY
    GILLICK, MR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (09) : 1024 - 1026
  • [33] Cyanobacteria reveal river water quality
    Burton, A
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [34] MONITORING ADULTS WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS - ARE WE DOING IT RIGHT?
    Poon, Dennis
    Baxter, Andrew
    Alabraba, Edward
    GUT, 2022, 71 : A181 - A182
  • [35] Catching the learner doing right versus doing wrong: Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results orientations and tolerance range sizes
    Chen, DD
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN MOVEMENT STUDIES, 2002, 42 (02): : 141 - 154
  • [36] Data Quality and Data Integrity Are the Same, Right? Wrong!
    McDowall, R. D.
    SPECTROSCOPY, 2019, 34 (11) : 22 - 29
  • [37] Treatment of acute ankle distortion in footballers: Are we doing it particularly right or particularly wrong?
    Elsner, Andreas
    Klemmer, Kira
    Vordemvenne, Thomas
    Waehnert, Dirk
    ORTHOPADIE, 2024, : 393 - 403
  • [38] Moral License in Video Games: When Being Right Can Mean Doing Wrong
    Ellithorpe, Morgan E.
    Cruz, Carlos
    Velez, John A.
    Ewoldsen, David R.
    Bogert, Adam K.
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2015, 18 (04) : 203 - 207
  • [39] “Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education
    Tijs Rotsaert
    Ernesto Panadero
    Tammy Schellens
    Annelies Raes
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2018, 33 : 255 - 275
  • [40] Doing it right: Radiation Oncology Treatment Quality Program
    Allison, R.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (04) : 337 - 338