Quantification of numerical uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics modelling of hydrocyclones

被引:30
|
作者
Karimi, M. [1 ]
Akdogan, G. [1 ]
Dellimore, K. H. [2 ]
Bradshaw, S. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Proc Engn, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, ZA-7602 Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
Hydrocyclone; Computational fluid dynamics; Numerical uncertainty; Grid Convergence Index; AIR CORE; FLOW; CFD;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.04.009
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Large Eddy Simulations of the flow through a hydrocyclone are used to demonstrate that the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) is a practical method of accounting for numerical uncertainty. The small values of GCI (<7.2%) associated with the tangential velocity predictions suggest that numerical uncertainty due to discretization error does not greatly contribute to the disagreement between simulation and experiment in the tangential direction. The large values of GCI (<303.2%) associated with the axial velocity predictions imply that uncertainty clue to discretization error is significant and further mesh refinement can yield better agreement in the axial direction. This was demonstrated through additional grid refinement which produced a reduction in the GCI of as much as 256.6% and a drop in the overall average difference between simulation and experimental of more than 36%. Overall, these results suggest the GCI is a useful tool for quantifying numerical uncertainty in CFD simulations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 54
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Turboelectric Uncertainty Quantification and Error Estimation in Numerical Modelling
    Alrashed, Mosab
    Nikolaidis, Theoklis
    Pilidis, Pericles
    Jafari, Soheil
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [22] Computational fluid dynamics modelling of jet fires
    Lewak, Michal
    Tepinski, Jaroslaw
    Lesiak, Piotr
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2022, 101 (05): : 324 - 329
  • [23] Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine
    Morris, Paul D.
    Narracott, Andrew
    von Tengg-Kobligk, Hendrik
    Soto, Daniel Alejandro Silva
    Hsiao, Sarah
    Lungu, Angela
    Evans, Paul
    Bressloff, Neil W.
    Lawford, Patricia V.
    Hose, D. Rodney
    Gunn, Julian P.
    [J]. HEART, 2016, 102 (01) : 18 - 28
  • [24] Computational fluid dynamics - modelling in the aluminium industry
    Zach, O
    Gamweger, K
    [J]. Advances in Refractories for the Metallurgical Industries IV, 2004, : 397 - 406
  • [25] Modelling a biochemical reaction with computational fluid dynamics
    Generalis, SC
    Glover, GMC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING, 2005, 3
  • [26] Computational fluid dynamics and virtual aeroengine modelling
    Chew, J. W.
    Hills, N. J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2009, 223 (12) : 2821 - 2834
  • [27] Computational fluid dynamics modelling of wood combustion
    Novozhilov, V
    Moghtaderi, B
    Fletcher, DF
    Kent, JH
    [J]. FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1996, 27 (01) : 69 - 84
  • [28] Progress in computational fluid dynamics for bioengineering modelling
    Cebral, Juan R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2009, 23 (08) : 567 - 568
  • [29] Computational fluid dynamics modelling of a static mixer
    Clifford, MJ
    Simmons, KA
    Roberts, J
    Truscot, TD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2006, 220 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [30] New Trends in Ensemble Forecast Strategy: Uncertainty Quantification for Coarse-Grid Computational Fluid Dynamics
    V. Resseguier
    L. Li
    G. Jouan
    P. Dérian
    E. Mémin
    B. Chapron
    [J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2021, 28 : 215 - 261