Comparison of general circulation model atmospheric wave simulations with wind observations of venusian mesosphere

被引:10
|
作者
Nakagawa, Hiromu [1 ]
Hoshino, Naoya [1 ]
Sornig, Manuela [2 ]
Kasaba, Yasumasa [1 ]
Sonnabend, Guido [3 ]
Stupar, Dusan [3 ]
Aoki, Shohei [1 ]
Murata, Isao [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Dept Geophys, Sendai, Miyagi 9898578, Japan
[2] Univ Cologne, Rhein Inst Umweltforsch, Abt Planetenforsch, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Inst Phys 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Venus; Atmosphere; Infrared observations; PLANETARY-SCALE WAVES; GRAVITY-WAVE; GLOBAL CIRCULATION; CLOUD TOPS; LOWER THERMOSPHERE; THERMAL STRUCTURE; SUPER-ROTATION; DYNAMICS; MORPHOLOGY; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.icarus.2013.02.029
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Simulations from our venusian general circulation model (GCM) forcing the presence of planetary-scale waves and mesoscale gravity waves were compared with infrared (IR) heterodyne observations of Doppler wind velocities in the venusian mesospheric altitude region (110 km). Observations confirmed the strong short-term variations in the venusian mesospheric wind velocity in a time scale of hours and days during March 16-22 and April 2-6 in 2009 at the morning/evening terminator. The variability in our GCM wind velocity produced by Kelvin wave was, in general, of the order of +/- 3-4 m/s with a period of 4 days for each latitude region. Comparing simulations with observations, the periodicity of the Kelvin-type disturbance was not seen in the observational data. The amplitude of the GCM wind velocity variation was only comparable to observed variability for the mid-latitude in March 2009. In most cases, the observations showed much higher variability than that produced by Kelvin wave. Our simulation also investigated the impact of upward propagating gravity waves on mesospheric and thermospheric wind variations. The results indicated that gravity waves could cause a wind variation with a +/- 15 m/s RMS amplitude at an altitude of about 110 km. The apparent randomness of the observed temporal variations and most of the variability can be potentially explained by the gravity wave breaking, although there remains unexplained sudden wind enhancement with 58 m/s with a time scale of 1-2 days in the observations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 849
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Specification of regional sea surface temperatures in atmospheric general circulation model simulations
    Kumar, A
    Hoerling, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D8) : 8901 - 8907
  • [22] Simulations of mid-Holocene climate using an atmospheric general circulation model
    Vettoretti, G
    Peltier, WR
    McFarlane, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1998, 11 (10) : 2607 - 2627
  • [23] Simulations of atmospheric phenomena at the Phoenix landing site with the Ames General Circulation Model
    Nelli, Steven M.
    Renno, Nilton O.
    Murphy, James R.
    Feldman, William C.
    Bougher, Stephen W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2010, 115
  • [24] Evidence of long-term change in zonal wind in the tropical lower mesosphere: Observations and model simulations
    Ratnam, M. Venkat
    Kumar, G. Kishore
    Rao, N. Venkateswara
    Murthy, B. V. Krishna
    Lastovicka, Jan
    Qian, Liying
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (02) : 397 - 401
  • [25] Cloud simulations with the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology general circulation model ECHAM4 and comparison with observations
    Chen, CT
    Roeckner, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D8) : 9335 - 9350
  • [26] Doppler imager wind measurements with simulations from the NCAR thermosphere-ionosphere-mesosphere electrodynamics circulation model
    Wu, DL
    Hays, PB
    Roble, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D14) : 19147 - 19160
  • [27] ASSESSMENT OF NCAR GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL PRECIPITATION IN COMPARISON WITH OBSERVATIONS
    SCHULTZ, P
    BARRON, EJ
    SLOAN, JL
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 1992, 97 (04) : 269 - 310
  • [28] A Comparison of Radiation Variables Calculated in the UCLA General Circulation Model to Observations
    Weare, Bryan C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1988, 1 (05)
  • [29] General circulation model simulations of the Mars Pathfinder atmospheric structure investigation/meteorology data
    Haberle, RM
    Joshi, MM
    Murphy, JR
    Barnes, JR
    Schofield, JT
    Wilson, G
    Lopez-Valverde, M
    Hollingsworth, JL
    Bridger, AFC
    Schaeffer, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1999, 104 (E4) : 8957 - 8974
  • [30] Simulations of the Tropical Intraseasonal Oscillation by the Atmospheric General Circulation Model of the Beijing Climate Center
    Dong Min
    Wu Tongwen
    Wang Zaizhi
    Zhang Fang
    [J]. ACTA METEOROLOGICA SINICA, 2010, 24 (05): : 571 - 583