Fenproporex and Amphetamine Pharmacokinetics in Oral Fluid After Controlled Oral Administration of Fenproporex

被引:12
|
作者
Comiran, Eloisa [1 ]
Souza, Daniele Zago [1 ,2 ]
Boehl, Paula Otero [1 ]
Mariotti, Kristiane de Cassia [1 ]
Pechansky, Flavio [3 ]
Arruda Vieira Duarte, Paulina do Carmo [4 ]
De Boni, Raquel Brandini [3 ]
Froeehlich, Pedro Eduardo [1 ]
Limberger, Renata Pereira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Farm, Programa Posgrad Ciencias Farmaceut, BR-90610000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Setor Tecn Cient, Superintendencia Reg Dept Policia Fed Rio Grande, BR-90610000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, CPAD, Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, BR-90610000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Esplanada Minist, Secretaria Nacl Polit Drogas SENAD, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
oral fluid; fenproporex; amphetamine; pharmacokinetics; solid-phase microextraction; ILLICIT DRUGS; METHAMPHETAMINE; SALIVA; URINE; ABUSE; BLOOD; STIMULANTS; PLASMA; TESTS;
D O I
10.1097/FTD.0b013e318263c6c5
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Fenproporex hydrochloride (FEN) is an anorectic drug used in the treatment of obesity, and its major metabolite is amphetamine (AMP), another central nervous system stimulant. The concentration versus time profile of FEN and its metabolite AMP has been described in classic biological matrices such as plasma and urine; however, there are no reports of such data in oral fluid. Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the pharmacokinetics of FEN and AMP in oral fluid after intake of FEN. Methods: Twenty-five milligrams of FEN (1 capsule of Desobesi-m) was orally administered to 6 male volunteers, and oral fluid samples were collected with a Quantisal device during 24.00 hours after drug ingestion. These samples were submitted to solid-phase microextraction before analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the selected-ion-monitoring mode, using deuterium-labeled AMP as internal standard. Results: After FEN administration, both analytes could be detected in oral fluid of all volunteers with an initial detection time varying from 0.50 to 1.00 hour. FEN peak concentrations occurred between 1.00 and 1.50 hours after administration and were between 70.7 and 227.5 mu g/L. For AMP, peak concentration occurred between 1.50 and 4.00 hours, reaching 33.0-150.9 mu g/L. Conclusion: The authors observed that oral administration of FEN resulted in significant amounts of FEN and AMP in oral fluid, showing that oral fluid could be a biological matrix suitable for pharmacokinetic studies for both analytes. Using a compartmental approach, FEN data were best fitted by 1-compartment model with first-order input and output, whereas AMP followed a 2-compartment model with first-order input and output.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 553
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PHARMACOKINETICS OF PENTOBARBITAL AFTER INTRAVENOUS AND ORAL ADMINISTRATION
    SMITH, RB
    DITTERT, LW
    GRIFFEN, WO
    DOLUISIO, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1973, 1 (01): : 5 - 16
  • [32] Aqueous pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin after oral administration
    Ferrari, E
    Pognuz, DR
    Pea, F
    Pavan, F
    Morgante, L
    Bandello, F
    Furlanut, M
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U465 - U465
  • [33] Pharmacodynamic effects and relationships to plasma and oral fluid pharmacokinetics after intravenous cocaine administration
    Ellefsen, Kayla N.
    Concheiro, Marta
    Pirard, Sandrine
    Gorelick, David A.
    Huestis, Marilyn A.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2016, 163 : 116 - 125
  • [34] Evaluation of Na+, K+-ATPase activity in the brain of young rats after acute administration of fenproporex
    Rezin, Gislaine T.
    Scaini, Giselli
    Goncalves, Cinara L.
    Ferreira, Gabriela K.
    Cardoso, Mariane R.
    Ferreira, Andrea G. K.
    Cunha, Maira J.
    Schmitz, Felipe
    Varela, Roger B.
    Quevedo, Joao
    Wyse, Angela T. S.
    Streck, Emilio L.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2014, 36 (02) : 138 - 142
  • [35] Pharmacokinetics of pradofloxacin and doxycycline in serum, saliva, and tear fluid of cats after oral administration
    Hartmann, A.
    Krebber, R.
    Daube, G.
    Hartmann, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 31 (02) : 87 - 94
  • [36] Duration of detectable methamphetamine and amphetamine excretion in urine after controlled oral administration of methamphetamine to humans
    Oyler, JM
    Cone, EJ
    Joseph, RE
    Moolchan, ET
    Huestis, MA
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 48 (10) : 1703 - 1714
  • [37] The pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability studies of columbianetin in rats after oral and intravenous administration
    Luo, Qian
    Wang, Chun-peng
    Li, Jin
    Ma, Wen-fang
    Bai, Yang
    Ma, Lin
    Gao, Xiu-mei
    Zhang, Bo-li
    Chang, Yan-xu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 150 (01) : 175 - 180
  • [38] Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of an Oral Formulation of Apixaban in Horses After Oral and Intravenous Administration
    Serpa, Priscila B. S.
    Brooks, Marjory B.
    Diverse, Thomas
    Ness, Sally
    Birschmann, Ingyild
    Papich, Mark G.
    Stokol, Tracy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [39] Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled vaporizer administration with and without alcohol
    Hartman, Rebecca L.
    Anizan, Sebastien
    Jang, Moonhee
    Brown, Timothy L.
    Yun, Keming
    Gorelick, David A.
    Milavetz, Gary
    Spurgin, Andrew
    Gaffney, Gary
    Huestis, Marilyn A.
    [J]. FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 33 (02) : 260 - 278
  • [40] Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled vaporizer administration with and without alcohol
    Rebecca L. Hartman
    Sébastien Anizan
    Moonhee Jang
    Timothy L. Brown
    Keming Yun
    David A. Gorelick
    Gary Milavetz
    Andrew Spurgin
    Gary Gaffney
    Marilyn A. Huestis
    [J]. Forensic Toxicology, 2015, 33 : 260 - 278