Effect of mechanical circulatory support on outcomes after heart transplantation

被引:36
|
作者
Drakos, SG [1 ]
Kfoury, AG [1 ]
Long, JW [1 ]
Stringham, JC [1 ]
Gilbert, EM [1 ]
Moore, SA [1 ]
Campbell, BK [1 ]
Nelson, KE [1 ]
Horne, BD [1 ]
Renlund, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah Transplantat Affiliate Hosp, Cardiac Transplant Program, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) before heart transplantation was previously associated with worse post-transplant outcomes than when MCS was not required. Given the changes in technology, expertise, patient selection, and timing of subsequent transplantation, we hypothesized that patients who require MCS before heart transplantation have similar outcomes after transplantation as those not requiring pre-transplant MCS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 278 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation from 1993 to 2002. MCS was required in 72 patients (HeartMate LVAS in 66, CardioWest Total Artificial Heart in 6) and was not required in 206 patients. The influence of pre-transplant MCS on post-transplant outcomes was assessed in the 2 groups. Results: Baseline clinical characteristics (age, gender, etiology of heart failure, history of diabetes mellitus, and donor age and gender) were similar in the 2 groups. One-month and I-year survival after transplantation did not differ between the groups (MCS, 92% and 85%, respectively vs; no MCS, 97% and 92%, respectively). Similar proportions of patients were free from rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation score >= 3A) at 1 year of follow-up (MCS, 56% vs no MCS, 52%, p = 0.60). No difference was observed between MCS and no MCS patients in other post-transplant events such as hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, extubation time, acute allograft dysfunction, reoperation rates, acute renal dysfunction, acute hepatic dysfunction, infections, arrhythmias, thromboembolic complications, neurologic complications, gastrointestinal complications and the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The incidence of chronic renal insufficiency was actually lower in the MCS Group (15.3% vs 37.9%, p = .001). Conclusion:. Post-transplant outcomes after pre-transplant use of MCS are similar to those when MCS is not required. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006;25:22-8. Copyright (c) 2006 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of durable mechanical circulatory support and allosensitization on mortality after heart transplantation
    Chiu, Peter
    Schaffer, Justin M.
    Oyer, Philip E.
    Pham, Michael
    Banerjee, Dipanjan
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    Ha, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (06): : 731 - 742
  • [32] Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction After DBD versus DCD Heart Transplantation
    Pai, V. B.
    Talukder, S.
    Martinez, L.
    Kydd, A.
    Bhagra, S. K.
    Lewis, C.
    Parameshwar, J.
    Messer, S.
    Osman, M.
    Virdi, A.
    Cacciottolo, P.
    Kaul, P.
    Rafiq, M.
    Allen, J.
    Large, S. R.
    Tsui, S. S.
    Jenkins, D. P.
    Pettit, S. J.
    Berman, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S48 - S48
  • [33] Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock Associated with Late Allograft Failure after Heart Transplantation
    D'Angelo, A.
    Naka, Y.
    Sanchez, J.
    Kaku, Y.
    Witer, L.
    Fried, J.
    Masoumi, A.
    Farr, M. A.
    Sayer, G.
    Uriel, N.
    Takeda, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S285 - S285
  • [34] Heart transplantation in children after mechanical circulatory support:: Comparison of heart transplantation with ventricular assist devices and elective heart transplantation
    Coskun, O
    Parsa, A
    Weitkemper, H
    Blanz, U
    Coskun, T
    Sandica, E
    Tenderich, G
    El-Banayosy, A
    Minami, K
    Körfer, R
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2005, 51 (05) : 495 - 497
  • [35] Mechanical circulatory support: not only a bridge to heart transplantation
    Sobieszczanska-Malek, Malgorzata
    Zielinski, Tomasz
    Korewicki, Jerzy
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2012, 70 (11) : 1182 - 1186
  • [36] Sex, Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Heart Transplantation
    Enriquez-Vazquez, Daniel
    Barge-Caballero, Eduardo
    Gonzalez-Vilchez, Francisco
    Almenar-Bonet, Luis
    Carmena, Maria Dolores Garcia-Cosio
    Gonzalez-Costello, Jose
    Gomez-Bueno, Manuel
    Castel-Lavilla, Maria Angeles
    Diaz-Molina, Beatriz
    Martinez-Selles, Manuel
    Mirabet-Perez, Sonia
    De la Fuente-Galan, Luis
    Hervas-Sotomayor, Daniela
    Rangel-Sousa, Diego
    Garrido-Bravo, Iris P.
    Blasco-Peiro, Teresa
    Juan-Aracil, Gregorio Rabago
    Muniz, Javier
    Crespo-Leiro, Maria G.
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2023, 11 (12) : 1763 - 1766
  • [37] Durable mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation
    Badiwala, Mitesh
    Dvirnik, Nazari
    Rao, Vivek
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 27 (05) : 488 - 494
  • [38] Mechanical circulatory support in infants, children and adolescents as bridge to heart transplantation: Current outcomes
    Rosenthal, D. N.
    Pelletier, M.
    Wright, G.
    Reinhartz, O.
    Bernstein, D.
    Chin, C.
    Roth, S.
    Liu, E.
    Robbins, R.
    Reitz, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 27 (02): : S189 - S189
  • [39] CU Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cancer Survivors: Challenges and Outcomes
    Ghosh, Nina
    Hilton, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [40] Duration of Heart Failure Is an Important Predictor of Outcomes After Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Loyaga-Rendon, Renzo Y.
    Acharya, Deepak
    Pamboukian, Salpy V.
    Tallaj, Jose A.
    Cantor, Ryan
    Starling, Randall C.
    Naftel, David C.
    Kirklin, James K.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2015, 8 (05) : 953 - 959