Human Embryo Gene Editing in China: The Uncertain Legal Status of the Embryo

被引:7
|
作者
Jiang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Rosemann, Achim [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Kenneth Wang Sch Law, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Jiang Su Univ, Reg Regulat Dev Collaborat Innovat Ctr, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Warwick, Dept Sociol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Ctr Bionetworking, Brighton, E Sussex, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CRISPR; Human embryo gene editing; Legal status of human embryo; Research regulation; Morality; China; CRISPR;
D O I
10.1057/s41292-018-0116-1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0831 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine processes of ethical deliberation, legislative developments, and social and political factors that have contributed to the emergence of human embryo gene editing as a field of life science research in China. For this purpose, we examine conceptions of the legal status of the human embryo in three domains of China's legal system: in patent law, in the jurisdictional domain of birth control, and in civil law. Each of these legal domains handles a different conception of the human embryo's moral and legal status, and in all three the embryo's status is contested and subject to changes. Our findings suggest that definitions of the legal status of the human embryo in China are at present in the midst of a renegotiation progress, which is driven by a variety of developments and causes. In this paper, we focus on three types of controversies that underlie this renegotiation process and we illustrate the conflicting aspirations, ethical arguments, and moral priorities that inform these conflicts. We end this article with three lines of consideration that might structure future studies on this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 66
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN HUMAN EMBRYO DONATION
    ROBERTSON, JA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1995, 64 (05) : 885 - 894
  • [32] The status of the human embryo in various religions
    Neaves, William
    DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 144 (14): : 2541 - 2543
  • [33] Human-embryo editing poses challenges for journals
    Daniel Cressey
    David Cyranoski
    Nature, 2015, 520 : 594 - 594
  • [34] Human embryo genetic editing: hope or pipe dream?
    de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (01) : 25 - 26
  • [35] Experts back genome editing in human embryo research
    Kmietowicz, Zosia
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
  • [36] Human Embryo Editing: Opportunities and Importance of Transnational Cooperation
    Pei, Duanqing
    Beier, David W.
    Levy-Lahad, Ephrat
    Marchant, Gary
    Rossant, Janet
    Belmonte, Juan Carlos Izpisua
    Lovell-Badge, Robin
    Jaenisch, Rudolf
    Charo, Alta
    Baltimore, David
    CELL STEM CELL, 2017, 21 (04) : 423 - 426
  • [37] Status of Human Embryo in vitro as Ethical and Legal Issue: Religious Origins of Disagreements in Approaches
    Lapaeva, Valentina V.
    PRAVO-ZHURNAL VYSSHEI SHKOLY EKONOMIKI, 2023, (02): : 4 - 24
  • [38] The Ethics of Genetic Cognitive Enhancement: Gene Editing or Embryo Selection?
    de Araujo, Marcelo
    PHILOSOPHIES, 2020, 5 (03)
  • [39] Embryo selection, gene editing, and the person-affecting principle
    Wang, Xueshi
    BIOETHICS, 2025,
  • [40] Livestock Gene Editing by One-step Embryo Manipulation
    Navarro-Serna, Sergio
    Vilarino, Marcela
    Park, Insung
    Gadea, Joaquin
    Ross, Pablo Juan
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 89