Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: initial experiences at a Swedish referral centre

被引:38
|
作者
Kirrander, Peter [1 ]
Andren, Ove [1 ]
Windahl, Torgny [1 ]
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
关键词
penile cancer; sentinel node; lymphoscintigraphy; false-negative rate; complications; learning curve; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NEGATIVE PATIENTS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; INVOLVEMENT; DISSECTION; METASTASES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11437.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Study Type Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? According to the current European Association of Urology Guidelines, dynamic sentinel node biopsy is the recommended approach to assess lymph node status in men with cN0 intermediate and high risk penile cancer. Nevertheless, most encouraging results derive from a limited number of studies. The present study shows a false-negative rate of 15%, comparable with or better than several previous studies. Nevertheless, the aim should be a false-negative rate of no more than 5%. We conclude that increased overall experience and the use of the complete modern dynamic sentinel node biopsy protocol are paramount to improve results. OBJECTIVE center dot To evaluate the false-negative rate and complication rate of dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) in penile cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS center dot In this retrospective study, 58 unilaterally or bilaterally clinically lymph node negative (cN0) patients with penile cancer (57 squamous cell carcinomas and one malignant melanoma), scheduled for DSNB at the orebro University Hospital, Sweden, between 1999 and 2011, were analysed. center dot Preoperative ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology of suspicious nodes were not introduced until 2008. center dot Patients were assessed by lymphoscintigraphy using 99mtechnetium nanocolloid on the day before surgery and the dissection of sentinel nodes was aided by the lymphoscintigraphic images and intraoperative detection of radiotracer and patent blue dye. center dot The false-negative rate and complication rate were calculated per groin. RESULTS center dot Of the 58 patients, 32 (55%) underwent preoperative ultrasonography. center dot Two patients had positive fine-needle aspiration cytology and discontinued further DSNB protocol. Of the remaining 56 patients, all but one were bilaterally cN0 and hence 111 cN0 groins were assessed by lymphoscintigraphy. center dot In the 55 bilaterally cN0 patients, lymphoscintigraphy visualized a bilateral sentinel node in 34 (62%). center dot At surgery, all excised sentinel nodes were radioactive while 43% were additionally blue. In total, at least one sentinel node was harvested in 96 (86%) of the DSNB staged groins. center dot A positive sentinel node was found in 11 groins (bilaterally in three patients). During a median follow-up of 21 months, two false-negative cases emerged, producing a false-negative rate of 15%. Both false-negative cases occurred during the first half of the study. The complication rate was 10%. The majority of complications were minor and transient. CONCLUSIONS center dot DSNB is a minimally invasive staging tool in men with cN0 penile cancer, enabling early detection of metastatic disease and thus optimal care. center dot Our false-negative rate of 15% is comparable or even favourable in comparison with several previous studies, but far from the 5% or less that we aim for. The complication rate found is somewhat higher than previously reported. center dot With increased overall experience and the continued use of the complete DSNB protocol, we believe our results will improve and the complication rate will decrease.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E48 / E53
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nodal staging in penile cancer using dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy
    O'Connell, C.
    Nason, G. J.
    Lonergan, P. E.
    Hegarty, P. K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 : 40 - 40
  • [22] Repeat dynamic sentinel node biopsy in patients with locally recurrent penile cancer
    Graafland, N. M.
    Olmos, R. A. Valdes
    Nieweg, O. E.
    Horenblas, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S290 - S290
  • [23] Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as the new paradigm for the management of penile cancer
    Yeung, Lawrence L.
    Brandes, Steven B.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (05) : 693 - 696
  • [24] CONTRALATERAL DYNAMIC SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH MONOLATERAL INGUINAL NODE METASTASES OF PENILE CANCER
    Torelli, Tullio
    Catanzaro, Mario
    Piva, Luigi
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Biasoni, Davide
    Milani, Angelo
    Necchi, Andrea
    Stagni, Silvia
    Salvioni, Roberto
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1826 - 1826
  • [25] THE EFFICACY OF DYNAMIC SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY IN PENILE CANCER: OUTCOMES FROM 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE AT A SINGLE UK CENTRE
    Wanis, Michael
    Boral, Ismet
    Summerton, Duncan
    Goddard, Jonathan
    Swallow, Thomas
    Dormer, John
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E840 - E840
  • [26] Developments in sentinel lymph node biopsy for penile cancer
    Nick Watkin
    Susannah La-Touche
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2014, 11 : 135 - 137
  • [27] Sentinel Node Biopsy for Penile Cancer - A Retrospective Review
    Lamb, C.
    Carey, N.
    Muirhead, R.
    Hendry, D.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (04) : E71 - E71
  • [28] Advancing experience in dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma
    Leijte, J.
    Kroon, B.
    Valdes Olmos, R.
    Nieweg, O.
    Horenblas, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 283 - 283
  • [29] Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer
    Omorphos, Savvas
    Saad, Zia
    Arya, Manit
    Freeman, Alex
    Malone, Peter
    Nigam, Raj
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    Muneer, Asif
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [30] Dynamic sentinel node biopsy and radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer:: A comparative study
    Perdonà, S
    Autorino, R
    De Sio, M
    Cindolo, L
    Damiano, R
    Claudio, L
    Di Lorenzo, G
    D'Armiento, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 198 - 198