Comparison of various Transmission Loss/Cost Allocation Methods-A Review

被引：0

作者：

Ahmed, K. Shafeeque ^{[1
]}

Karthikeyan, S. Prabhakar ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] VIT Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India

来源：

2017 INNOVATIONS IN POWER AND ADVANCED COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (I-PACT) | 2017年

关键词：

loss allocation; bilateral contract; independent system operator; penalty factor; penalized quoted cost; loss contribution fraction;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

Transmission losses are considered to be thekey factor of power generation to meet the load requirement. Deregulated electricity markets operate under bilateral market, pool market or hybrid market. In this competitive electricity market, Independent System Operator (ISO) should allocate transmission losses among the involved partners in a fair way. Transmission loss pricing should take into account the distance between the generator and the load. This paper presents a detail discussion and comparison of five recent and relevant loss allocation methods like penalized quoted cost (PQC), proportional generation and proportional load (PGPL), proportional sharing, Z(bus) and modified Z(bus) method. The significance of PQC and PGPL methods are highlighted with other methods. The results are presented for a sample 6 bus system and IEEE 14 bus system. The simulation results are obtained using MATLAB R2014a.

引用

页数：4

共 50 条

[41] MISSING DATA SAMPLES: SYSTEMATIZATION AND CONDUCTING METHODS-A REVIEW
Ilic, Ivana D.
Visnjic, Jelena M.
Randjelovic, Branislav M.
Mitic, Vojislav M.
[J]. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2021, 36 (01): : 191 - 204
[42] Comparison of Loss Allocation Methods Using Particle Swarm Optimization
Nouri, S.
Jadid, S.
[J]. 2008 40TH NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS 2008), 2008, : 217 - 224
[43] MW-Mile Method Considering the Cost of Loss Allocation for Transmission Pricing
Avinash, D.
Chalapathi, B.
[J]. 2015 CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL, COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH (PCCCTSG), 2015, : 128 - 131
[44] Allocation of transmission loss cost with traceable flow method in power system network
Siahkali, H.
[J]. 2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION IN AFRICA, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1 - 6
[45] "Singing" Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors and Mitigation Methods-A Review
Covaci, Corina
Gontean, Aurel
[J]. SENSORS, 2022, 22 (10)
[46] Comparison of algorithms for loss allocation in transmission networks considering power redispatch
Lima, DA
Padilha-Feltrin, A
[J]. 2004 IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION: LATIN AMERICA, 2004, : 212 - 217
[47] Stabilisation of Kuttanad clay by environment friendly methods-a review
Kannan, K.
Gayathri, S.
Jose, Abiya K.
Nair, Lakshmi P.
Das, Greeshma
Vinod, P.
[J]. EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR SOCIETY, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, : 229 - 234
[48] Exposure to airborne formaldehyde: Sampling and analytical methods-A review
Dugheri, Stefano
Massi, Daniela
Mucci, Nicola
Marrubini, Giorgio
Cappelli, Giovanni
Speltini, Andrea
Bonferoni, Maria Cristina
Arcangeli, Giulio
[J]. TRENDS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 29
[49] UWB Localization Procedures with Range Control Methods-A Review
VenkataLakshmi, Y.
Singh, Parulpreet
[J]. ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING, ICASPACE 2021, 2022, 929 : 295 - 316
[50] Marginal pricing of transmission services:: A comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods
Rubio-Odériz, FJ
Pérez-Arriaga, IJ
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (01) : 448 - 454

← 1 2 3 4 5 →