Comparison of various Transmission Loss/Cost Allocation Methods-A Review

被引：0

作者：

Ahmed, K. Shafeeque ^{[1
]}

Karthikeyan, S. Prabhakar ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] VIT Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India

来源：

2017 INNOVATIONS IN POWER AND ADVANCED COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (I-PACT) | 2017年

关键词：

loss allocation; bilateral contract; independent system operator; penalty factor; penalized quoted cost; loss contribution fraction;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

Transmission losses are considered to be thekey factor of power generation to meet the load requirement. Deregulated electricity markets operate under bilateral market, pool market or hybrid market. In this competitive electricity market, Independent System Operator (ISO) should allocate transmission losses among the involved partners in a fair way. Transmission loss pricing should take into account the distance between the generator and the load. This paper presents a detail discussion and comparison of five recent and relevant loss allocation methods like penalized quoted cost (PQC), proportional generation and proportional load (PGPL), proportional sharing, Z(bus) and modified Z(bus) method. The significance of PQC and PGPL methods are highlighted with other methods. The results are presented for a sample 6 bus system and IEEE 14 bus system. The simulation results are obtained using MATLAB R2014a.

引用

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Review of cost based transmission losses allocation methods
Jing, Zhaoxia
Wen, Fushuan
[J]. 2006 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION. VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 1587 - +
[2] Transmission Cost Allocation Methods
Meszaros, Alexander
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IVTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING - ELEKTROENERGETIKA 2007, 2007, : 733 - 736
[3] From loss allocation to loss cost allocation: a comparative study of different loss cost allocation methods
Ghofrani-Jahromi, Z.
Ehsan, M.
Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.
Parvania, M.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 23 (04): : 586 - 600
[4] Comparison of Transmission Cost Allocation Methods in a Multi-area Framework
Lima, Delberis A.
Vargas, Juan C.
[J]. 2014 IEEE PES GENERAL MEETING - CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2014,
[5] Measurement of balance in computer posturography: Comparison of methods-A brief review
Chaudhry, Hans
Bukiet, Bruce
Ji, Zhiming
Findley, Thomas
[J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2011, 15 (01) : 82 - 91
[6] Comparison of IGBT Junction Temperature Measurement and Estimation Methods-A Review
Sathik, Mohamed Halick Mohamed
Pou, Josep
Prasanth, Sundararajan
Muthu, Vivek
Simanjorang, Rejeki
Gupta, Amit Kumar
[J]. 2017 ASIAN CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, POWER AND TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION (ACEPT), 2017,
[7] A comparison between various numerical simulation methods for predicting the transmission loss in silencers
Guo, Li-Xin
Fan, Wei
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2017, 5 (01): : 163 - 180
[8] Potentials and challenges in enhancing the gear transmission development with machine learning methods-a review
Sendlbeck, Stefan
Maurer, Matthias
Otto, Michael
Stahl, Karsten
[J]. FORSCHUNG IM INGENIEURWESEN-ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2023, 87 (04): : 1333 - 1346
[9] Allocation of transmission loss cost using game theory
Molina, Yuri P.
Prada, Ricardo B.
Saavedra, Osvaldo R.
[J]. 2007 IEEE LAUSANNE POWERTECH, VOLS 1-5, 2007, : 407 - +
[10] Comparison of Transmission Cost Allocation Methods Case Study: DET WEST Power System
Pop, Oana
Kilyeni, Stefan
Barbulescu, Constantin
Paunescu, Doru
[J]. 2012 16TH IEEE MEDITERRANEAN ELECTROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE (MELECON), 2012, : 265 - 268

← 1 2 3 4 5 →