Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors Larger than 4 cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Bi, Liangkuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Caixia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Kaiwen [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xinxiang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Kewei [1 ,2 ]
Han, Jinli [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Hai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Wen [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Xiangyun [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Tianxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Key Lab Malignant Tumor Gene Regulat & Target The, Guangdong Higher Educ Inst, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0075050
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: With the establishment of minimally invasive surgery in society, the robot has been increasingly widely used in the urologic field, including in partial nephrectomy. This study aimed to comprehensively summarize the currently available evidence on the feasibility and safety of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors of >4 cm. Method and Findings: An electronic database search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis was based on all relevant studies that assessed robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors of >4 cm. Five studies were included. The meta-analysis involved 3 studies from 11 institutions including 154 patients, while the narrative review involved the remaining 2 studies from 5 institutions including 64 patients. In the meta-analysis, the mean ischemic time, operation time, and console time was 28, 319, and 189 minutes, respectively. The estimated blood loss and length of stay was 317 ml and 3.8 days, respectively. The rates of conversion, positive margins, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, hilar clamping, and collecting system repair were 7.0%, 3.5%, 7.0%, 9.8%, 93.9%, and 47.5%, respectively. The narrative review showed results similar to those of the meta-analysis. Conclusions: Robotic partial nephrectomy is feasible and safe for renal tumors of >4 cm with an acceptable warm ischemic time, positive margin rate, conversion rate, complication rate, operation time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Renal functional and cardiovascular outcomes of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ochoa-Arvizo, Mario
    Garcia-Campa, Mariano
    Santos-Santillana, Karla M.
    Klatte, Tobias
    Garcia-Chairez, Luis R.
    Gonzalez-Colmenero, Alejandro D.
    Pallares-Mendez, Rigoberto
    Cervantes-Miranda, Daniel E.
    Plata-Huerta, Hiram H.
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Gutierrez-Gonzalez, Adrian
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (03) : 113 - 124
  • [22] Renal functional and cardiovascular outcomes of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ochoa-Arivzo, M-A
    Diaz Gonzalez-Colmenero, A.
    Pallares-Mendez, R.
    Garcia-Chairez, L. R.
    Garcia-Campa, M.
    Cervantes-Miranda, D. E.
    Plata-Huerta, H. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S202 - S202
  • [23] Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: perioperative and functional outcomes
    Rocco Papalia
    Giuseppe Simone
    Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
    Salvatore Guaglianone
    Manuela Costantini
    Diana Giannarelli
    Carlo Ludovico Maini
    Ester Forastiere
    Michele Gallucci
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 671 - 676
  • [24] Comparison between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Kun-peng
    Chen, Si-yu
    Wang, Chen-yang
    Yang, Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (06) : 1769 - 1782
  • [25] Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy without renal ischaemia for tumours larger than 4 cm: perioperative and functional outcomes
    Papalia, Rocco
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Guaglianone, Salvatore
    Costantini, Manuela
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Maini, Carlo Ludovico
    Forastiere, Ester
    Gallucci, Michele
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (05) : 671 - 676
  • [26] Impact of Renal Hilar Control on Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Systematic Review and Cumulative Meta-analysis
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Medina, Luis G.
    Gill, Tania S.
    Mendelsohn, Alec
    Husain, Fatima
    Bhardwaj, Lokesh
    Artibani, Walter
    Sotelo, Rene
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (04): : 619 - 635
  • [27] Outcome of radiofrequency ablation over partial nephrectomy for small renal mass (<4 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yue
    Chen, Shouzhen
    Chen, Fan
    Zhu, Kejia
    Deng, Qiming
    Luo, Li
    Shi, Benkang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (11): : 20670 - +
  • [28] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: results of a multicenter, international series
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Bhayani, Sam
    Porter, James
    Buffi, Nicolo
    Lee, Robin
    Cestari, Andrea
    Novara, Giacomo
    Mottrie, Alexander
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (05) : 665 - 670
  • [29] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: results of a multicenter, international series
    Vincenzo Ficarra
    Sam Bhayani
    James Porter
    Nicolò Buffi
    Robin Lee
    Andrea Cestari
    Giacomo Novara
    Alexander Mottrie
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 665 - 670
  • [30] Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for cT2 or greater renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jingdong
    Zhang, Yanping
    Teng, Zhihai
    Han, Zhenwei
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (05) : 435 - 444