Drug treatment and thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

被引:0
|
作者
Spoehr, Fabian [1 ]
Wenzel, Volker [2 ]
Boettiger, Bernd W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
antiarrhythmic agent; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; thrombolysis; vasopressor agent;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no specific drug therapy has been shown to improve survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest, and only few drugs have a proven benefit for short-term survival. This article reviews recent experimental and clinical data about vasopressor, antiarrhythmic and thrombolytic agents. Recent findings General use of high-dose epinephrine (> 1 mg) can not be recommended, whereas it should be considered during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. No catecholamine superior to epinephrine has been identified. Arginine vasopressin has been shown to be as effective as epinephrine in patients with ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity, and may be more effective in patients presenting with asystole or as the second vasopressor (after epinephrine) in refractory cardiac arrest. Sodium bicarbonate should not be 'blindly' administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation unless an arterial blood gas analysis can be obtained, or after prolonged unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Amiodarone should be preferred over lidocaine, since it may improve short-term survival. Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be beneficial if a pulmonary embolism or acute myocardial infarction is suggested to be the cause of the cardiac arrest. Summary Epinephrine still represents the first-line vasopressor during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Arginine vasopressin may be considered in patients presenting with asystole or who are unresponsive to initial treatment with epinephrine. Amiodarone should be preferred to other antiarrythmic agents in patients with cardiac arrest. Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising new therapeutic option, but its general use in cardiac arrest cannot be recommended until the results of a large multicentre trial become available.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Antiarrhythmic drug therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: should we use it?
    Soar, Jasmeet
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 24 (03) : 138 - 142
  • [12] DRUG SELECTION AND DELIVERY IN CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION
    GREENBERG, MI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1984, 2 (05): : 457 - 458
  • [13] Awareness during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Asghar, Ali
    Salim, Bushra
    Tahir, Saqiba
    Islam, Fahad
    Khan, Muhammad F.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (02) : 136 - 137
  • [14] Thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Spoehr, F.
    Boettinger, B. W.
    ANAESTHESIA, PAIN, INTENSIVE CARE AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, : 247 - 255
  • [15] Drugs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Morley, Peter T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 17 (03) : 214 - 218
  • [16] Thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Padosch, SA
    Motsch, J
    Böttiger, BW
    ANAESTHESIST, 2002, 51 (07): : 516 - 532
  • [17] Drugs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Vallentin, Mikael F.
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Holmberg, Mathias J.
    Andersen, Lars W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 26 (03) : 242 - 250
  • [18] Workload during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Kuepper, T.
    Steffgen, J.
    Morrison, A.
    Milledge, J.
    Schoeffl, V.
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 88 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [19] Feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Bohn, Andreas
    Gude, Philipp
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (02) : 200 - 203
  • [20] Workload during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    T. Küpper
    J. Steffgen
    A. Morrison
    J. Milledge
    V. Schöffl
    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2015, 88 : 175 - 184