Radiation oncology Device Approval in the United States and Canada

被引:1
|
作者
Beers, Craig A. [1 ]
Smith, Wendy L. [2 ]
Weppler, Sarah [2 ]
Schinkel, Colleen [2 ]
Quon, Harvey [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Med Phys, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Radiat Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
radiation oncology; medical device; health canada; fda; US;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.4351
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Medical devices are a crucial component in the field of radiation oncology. The review and licensing of radiation oncology devices (RODs) is managed on a national basis in Canada by Health Canada and in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The purpose of this study was to examine differences in ROD licensing timelines between Health Canada and the FDA that may impact the ability of Canadians to access the most up-to-date radiation oncology care. Methods A list of ROD was compiled by searching keywords, manufacturers, and proprietary device names in the publicly accessible Canadian Medical Devices Active Licence Listing (MDALL) and the American Establishment Registration & Device Listing and the 510(k) Premarket Notification database. ROD licensing dates were then obtained through both databases. ROD were included if they were licensed in both countries. Results A total of 51 RODs were included in this study and it was found that 71% (36/51) were issued licenses for sale in the United States before Canada, at a mean of 506 days sooner (median [IOR] = 282 [326.5]). No trends in licensing dates were found by stratifying devices by type. Analyses were limited to the date of licensing only, as Health Canada provided no publicly-available information regarding submission milestones such as first submission date for the RODs studied. Conclusions The majority of radiation oncology devices examined were licensed for sale in the USA before Canada. Due to the absence of publicly available information regarding initial ROD application date, we cannot evaluate the impact of the approval process on the overall difference in licensing date. Importantly, this research highlights a lack of publicly-available information from Health Canada regarding the medical device approval process for the radiation oncology devices studied herein.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Practice of Radiation Oncology in Canada
    Lalani, Nafisha
    Cummings, Bernard
    Halperin, Ross
    Rakovitch, Eileen
    Brundage, Michael
    Vigneault, Eric
    Milosevic, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 97 (05): : 876 - 880
  • [32] Representation trends in radiation oncology training programs in the United States.
    Garcia, Emilie
    Lang, Jacob
    Oke, Oluchi Ukaegbu
    Reddy, Krishna
    Ekwenna, Obi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [33] Variations in Resources Among Radiation Oncology Residency Programs in the United States
    Thomas, Toms Vengaloor
    Kuruvilla, Teessa Perekattu
    Kahn, Jenna
    Bhanat, Eldrin
    Parr, Amy Q.
    Albert, Ashley
    Chowdhary, Mudit
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [34] United States Radiation Oncology Fellowship Growth From 2010 to 2020
    Chowdhary, Mudit
    O'Bryant, Sinead
    Peters, Gabrielle W.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Mohamad, Osama
    Royce, Trevor J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : 622 - 626
  • [35] Radiation Oncology Resident Research Productivity in the United States: 2015 to 2019
    Rowley, Jared P.
    Sindhu, Kunal K.
    Smith, William H.
    Nehlsen, Anthony D.
    Smith, Andrew W.
    Lehrer, Eric J.
    Buckstein, Michael
    Lazarev, Stanislav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 109 (04): : 1111 - 1118
  • [36] Burnout in Academic Chairs of Radiation Oncology in the United States: The SCAROP Survey
    Kusano, A.
    Thomas, C. R.
    Bonner, J.
    DeWeese, T. L.
    Formenti, S. C.
    Hahn, S. M.
    Lawrence, T. S.
    Mittal, B. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S101 - S101
  • [37] Accessibility and Availability of Online Information for United States Radiation Oncology Residencies
    Wakefield, D. V.
    Jethanandani, A.
    Manole, B.
    Marcrom, S.
    May, M.
    Farmer, M. R.
    Ballo, M. T.
    VanderWalde, N. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E372 - E373
  • [38] LGBTQ plus Training in United States Radiation Oncology Residency Programs
    Domogauer, J. D.
    Gerber, N. K.
    Rawn, E.
    Du, K. L.
    Perez, C. A.
    Quinn, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S74 - S74
  • [39] Characterizing Wellness Leadership in Academic Radiation Oncology Departments in the United States
    Ponce, S. E. Beltran
    Taswell, C. S. Seldon
    Franco, I. I.
    Paradis, K. C.
    Mattes, M. D.
    Kelly, T. R.
    Katz, L. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E503 - E504
  • [40] United States Radiation Oncology Curriculum Development: The Tail is Wagging the Dog
    Golden, Daniel W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (01): : E1 - E4