A new approach to evaluate regression models during validation of bioanalytical assays

被引:56
|
作者
Singtoroj, T
Tarning, J
Annerberg, A
Ashton, M
Bergqvist, Y
White, NJ
Lindegardh, N
Day, NPJ
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Trop Med, Wellcome Unit, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Pharmacol, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Dalarna Univ Coll, Borlange, Sweden
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med, Nuffield Dept Clin Med, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
bioanalytical assays; calibration; transformation; weighting; piperaquine; linear regression; liquid chromatography;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.006
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The quality of bioanalytical data is highly dependent on using an appropriate regression model for calibration curves. Non-weighted linear regression has traditionally been used but is not necessarily the optimal model. Bioanalytical assays generally benefit from using either data transformation and/or weighting since variance normally increases with concentration. A data set with calibrators ranging from 9 to 10000 ng/mL was used to compare a new approach with the traditional approach for selecting an optimal regression model. The new approach used a. combination of relative residuals at each calibration level together with precision and accuracy of independent quality control samples over 4 days to select and,justify the best regression model. The results showed that log-log transformation without weighting was the simplest model to fit the calibration data and ensure good predictability for this data set. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 227
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation: Best Practices for Chromatographic and Ligand Binding Assays
    C. T. Viswanathan
    Surendra Bansal
    Brian Booth
    Anthony J. DeStefano
    Mark J. Rose
    Jeffrey Sailstad
    Vinod P. Shah
    Jerome P. Skelly
    Patrick G. Swann
    Russell Weiner
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, 24 : 1962 - 1973
  • [22] A new approach to parameters identification of fuzzy regression models
    Liu, Fengqiu
    Wang, Jianmin
    Peng, Yu
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 127 - +
  • [23] Bioanalytical LC-MS/MS validation of therapeutic drug monitoring assays in oncology
    van Nuland, Merel
    Rosing, Hilde
    Schellens, Jan H. M.
    Beijnen, Jos H.
    BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2020, 34 (01)
  • [24] Bioanalytical method validation considerations for LC-MS/MS assays of therapeutic proteins
    Duggan, Jeffrey X.
    Vazvaei, Faye
    Jenkins, Rand
    BIOANALYSIS, 2015, 7 (11) : 1389 - 1395
  • [25] Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: Best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays
    Viswanathan, C. T.
    Bansal, Surendra
    Booth, Brian
    DeStefano, Anthony J.
    Rose, Mark J.
    Sailstad, Jeffrey
    Shah, Vinod P.
    Skelly, Jerome P.
    Swann, Patrick G.
    Weiner, Russell
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 24 (10) : 1962 - 1973
  • [26] A new approach to evaluate mechanistic relationships among genotoxic phenomena: validation
    Rosenkranz, HS
    Cunningham, AR
    MUTAGENESIS, 2000, 15 (04) : 325 - 328
  • [27] An integrated bioanalytical method development and validation approach: case studies
    Xue, Y. -J.
    Melo, Brian
    Vallejo, Martha
    Zhao, Yuwen
    Tang, Lina
    Chen, Yuan-Shek
    Keller, Karin M.
    BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2012, 26 (10) : 1215 - 1227
  • [28] Replicates Number for Drug Stability Testing during Bioanalytical Method Validation-An Experimental and Retrospective Approach
    Gniazdowska, Elzbieta
    Goch, Wojciech
    Giebultowicz, Joanna
    Rudzki, Piotr J.
    MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (02):
  • [29] REGRESSION OR CLASSIFICATION? NEW METHODS TO EVALUATE NO-REFERENCE PICTURE AND VIDEO QUALITY MODELS
    Tu, Zhengzhong
    Chen, Chia-Ju
    Chen, Li-Heng
    Wang, Yilin
    Birkbeck, Neil
    Adsumilli, Balu
    Bovik, Alan C.
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP 2021), 2021, : 2085 - 2089
  • [30] Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules
    DeSilva, B
    Smith, W
    Weiner, R
    Kelley, M
    Smolec, JM
    Lee, B
    Khan, M
    Tacey, R
    Hill, H
    Celniker, A
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 20 (11) : 1885 - 1900