A new approach to evaluate regression models during validation of bioanalytical assays

被引:56
|
作者
Singtoroj, T
Tarning, J
Annerberg, A
Ashton, M
Bergqvist, Y
White, NJ
Lindegardh, N
Day, NPJ
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Trop Med, Wellcome Unit, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Pharmacol, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Dalarna Univ Coll, Borlange, Sweden
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med, Nuffield Dept Clin Med, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
bioanalytical assays; calibration; transformation; weighting; piperaquine; linear regression; liquid chromatography;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2005.11.006
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The quality of bioanalytical data is highly dependent on using an appropriate regression model for calibration curves. Non-weighted linear regression has traditionally been used but is not necessarily the optimal model. Bioanalytical assays generally benefit from using either data transformation and/or weighting since variance normally increases with concentration. A data set with calibrators ranging from 9 to 10000 ng/mL was used to compare a new approach with the traditional approach for selecting an optimal regression model. The new approach used a. combination of relative residuals at each calibration level together with precision and accuracy of independent quality control samples over 4 days to select and,justify the best regression model. The results showed that log-log transformation without weighting was the simplest model to fit the calibration data and ensure good predictability for this data set. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 227
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An approach to select linear regression model in bioanalytical method validation
    Sonawane, Sandeep S.
    Chhajed, Santosh S.
    Attar, Sana S.
    Kshirsagar, Sanjay J.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [2] An approach to select linear regression model in bioanalytical method validation
    Sandeep S. Sonawane
    Santosh S. Chhajed
    Sana S. Attar
    Sanjay J. Kshirsagar
    Journal of Analytical Science and Technology, 10
  • [3] Review of Recommendations for Bioanalytical Method Validation: Chromatographic Assays and Ligand Binding Assays
    Londhe, Vaishali
    Rajadhyaksha, Madhura
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2019, 82 (02) : 523 - 535
  • [4] Review of Recommendations for Bioanalytical Method Validation: Chromatographic Assays and Ligand Binding Assays
    Vaishali Londhe
    Madhura Rajadhyaksha
    Chromatographia, 2019, 82 : 523 - 535
  • [5] Reliable procedures to evaluate and repair crosstalk for bioanalytical MS/MS assays
    Morin, Louis-Philippe
    Mess, Jean-Nicholas
    Furtado, Milton
    Garofolo, Fabio
    BIOANALYSIS, 2011, 3 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [6] THE NEW APPROACH FOR REGRESSION MODELS ANALYSIS
    Baskin, E. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIABILITY QUALITY & SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2008, 15 (04): : 367 - 390
  • [7] Sound science versus anxiety: validation of bioanalytical assays for small molecules
    Svensson, Leif D.
    BIOANALYSIS, 2011, 3 (24) : 2685 - 2689
  • [8] AN APPROACH TO BIOANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION: A REVIEW
    Arora, Komal
    Gangadharappa, H. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH, 2016, 7 (06):
  • [9] A new approach to formulate fuzzy regression models
    Chen, Liang-Hsuan
    Nien, Sheng-Hsing
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 86
  • [10] Regression models for exceedance data: a new approach
    Marcelo Bourguignon
    Fernando Ferraz do Nascimento
    Statistical Methods & Applications, 2021, 30 : 157 - 173