The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public - A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1025
|
作者
Luo, Min [1 ]
Guo, Lixia [2 ]
Yu, Mingzhou [3 ]
Jiang, Wenying [4 ]
Wang, Haiyan [5 ]
机构
[1] 965th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Peoples Lib, Dept Anesthesiol, Jilin 132011, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] 96605 Army Hosp, Dept Psychol, Jilin 134001, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] 965th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Peoples Lib, Dept Ophthalmol, Jilin 132011, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] 965th Hosp Joint Logist Support Force Peoples Lib, Dept Dis Control, Jilin 132011, Jilin, Peoples R China
[5] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
Psychological intervention; COVID-19; Review; Stress; Anxiety; Depression; Psychological impact; HEALTH-CARE; OUTBREAK; EPIDEMIC; CHINA; POPULATION; RISK; PEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical and laboratory factors associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Minh, Le Huu Nhat
    Abozaid, Ali Ahmed-Fouad
    Ha, Nam Xuan
    Le Quang, Loc
    Gad, Abdelrahman Gamil
    Tiwari, Ranjit
    Nhat-Le, Tran
    Quyen, Dinh Kim
    AL-Manaseer, Balqees
    Kien, Nguyen Dang
    Vuong, Nguyen Lam
    Zayan, Ahmad Helmy
    Nhi, Le Huu Hanh
    Surya Dila, Kadek Agus
    Varney, Joseph
    Tien Huy, Nguyen
    [J]. REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 31 (06)
  • [32] Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hariyanto, Timotius Ivan
    Hardyson, Willie
    Kurniawan, Andree
    [J]. DRUG RESEARCH, 2021, 71 (05) : 265 - 274
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Use in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cui, Yuqing
    Sun, Yali
    Sun, Junyi
    Liang, Huoyan
    Ding, Xianfei
    Sun, Xueyi
    Wang, Dong
    Sun, Tongwen
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (04) : 2447 - 2463
  • [34] Imaging characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pediatric cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zang, Si-Tian
    Han, Xu
    Cui, Qi
    Chang, Qing
    Wu, Qi-Jun
    Zhao, Yu-Hong
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 10 (01) : 1 - +
  • [35] Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the liver: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kumar-M, Praveen
    Mishra, Shubhra
    Jha, Daya Krishna
    Shukla, Jayendra
    Choudhury, Arup
    Mohindra, Ritin
    Mandavdhare, Harshal S.
    Dutta, Usha
    Sharma, Vishal
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 14 (05) : 711 - 722
  • [36] Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the liver: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Praveen Kumar-M
    Shubhra Mishra
    Daya Krishna Jha
    Jayendra Shukla
    Arup Choudhury
    Ritin Mohindra
    Harshal S. Mandavdhare
    Usha Dutta
    Vishal Sharma
    [J]. Hepatology International, 2020, 14 : 711 - 722
  • [37] Sex difference in coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abate, Biruk Beletew
    Kassie, Ayelign Mengesha
    Kassaw, Mesfin Wudu
    Aragie, Teshome Gebremeskel
    Masresha, Setamlak Adane
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [38] Insulin Therapy and Outcome of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
    Hariyanto, Timotius Ivan
    Lugito, Nata Pratama Hardjo
    Yanto, Theo Audi
    Siregar, Jeremia Immanuel
    Kurniawan, Andree
    [J]. ENDOCRINE METABOLIC & IMMUNE DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 22 (05) : 481 - 489
  • [39] Corticosteroids on the Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    Ali, Kosar Mohamed
    Aghaei, Abbas
    Zali, Alireza
    Neishaboori, Arian Madani
    Zarghi, Afshin
    Safari, Saeed
    Hashemi, Behrooz
    Forouzanfar, Mohammad Mehdi
    Hosseini, Mostafa
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 49 (08) : 1411 - 1421
  • [40] Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations
    Saadatjoo, S.
    Miri, M.
    Hassanipour, S.
    Ameri, H.
    Arab-Zozani, M.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 194 : 185 - 195