Performance differences between face-to-face and online students in economics

被引：16
|
作者：
Dendir, Seife [1 ]
机构：
[1] Radford Univ, Dept Econ, Box 6952, Radford, VA 24142 USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS | 2019年 / 94卷 / 03期
关键词：
Face to face; online; economics; microeconomics; undergraduate; UNDERGRADUATE ECONOMICS; PRINCIPLES; DISTANCE; INSTRUCTION; CLASSROOM; COURSES;
D O I：
10.1080/08832323.2018.1503586
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
The author analyzes differences in student performance in an economics course offered face to face (F2F) and online over a period of four semesters at a comprehensive public university. Apart from mode of delivery, the characteristics of the course stayed nearly identical throughout. Exam and homework assignment scores are used as measures of performance. Although mean comparisons and basic regressions indicate that online students outperform F2F students on exams, once self-selection is addressed, online students no more outperform F2F students. Furthermore, according to assessments that gauge higher levels of learning, there is evidence that online students underperform compared with F2F students.
引用
收藏
页码：175 / 184
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The acceptance model of online learning by face-to-face higher education students
    Martinho, Domingos
    Jorge, Idalina
    Brites, Rui
    2015 10TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2015,
  • [22] Preferences for Online and/or Face-to-Face Counseling among University Students in Malaysia
    Wong, Kah P.
    Bonn, Gregory
    Tam, Cai L.
    Wong, Chee P.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [23] Undergraduate students' attitudes towards online versus face-to-face counseling
    Cui, Lixia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 267 - 267
  • [24] Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning
    Paechter, Manuela
    Maier, Brigitte
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 13 (04): : 292 - 297
  • [25] College Students' Multitasking Behavior in Online Versus Face-to-Face Courses
    Lepp, Andrew
    Barkley, Jacob E.
    Karpinski, Aryn C.
    Singh, Shweta
    SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [26] Complex trajectories in higher education students: online and face-to-face universities
    Villar-Aguiles, Alicia
    Munoz-Rodriguez, David
    JOURNAL OF NEW APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [27] Quantitative study: face-to-face and online teaching of German to polytechnic students
    Lemos, Patricia Rojo
    LENGUAJE Y TEXTOS, 2024, (58): : 129 - 140
  • [28] Difference in Mentalizing Function Between Face-To-Face and Online Communications
    Kim, Joohyeong
    Watanabe, Hayato
    Yokosawa, Koichi
    9TH EUROPEAN MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 1, EMBEC 2024, 2024, 112 : 327 - 335
  • [29] Are Undergraduate Students Ready for Online Learning ? A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Sections of a Course
    Keramidas, Cathy Galyon
    RURAL SPECIAL EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2012, 31 (04) : 25 - 32
  • [30] Impact of face-to-face tutoring on academic performance of university students
    Garcia Lopez, Ramona Imelda
    Cuevas Salazar, Omar
    Vales Garcia, Javier Jose
    Cruz Medina, Isidro Roberto
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION, 2012, 58 (02):
12345