Performance differences between face-to-face and online students in economics

被引：16

作者：

Dendir, Seife ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Radford Univ, Dept Econ, Box 6952, Radford, VA 24142 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS | 2019年 / 94卷 / 03期

关键词：

Face to face; online; economics; microeconomics; undergraduate; UNDERGRADUATE ECONOMICS; PRINCIPLES; DISTANCE; INSTRUCTION; CLASSROOM; COURSES;

D O I：

10.1080/08832323.2018.1503586

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

The author analyzes differences in student performance in an economics course offered face to face (F2F) and online over a period of four semesters at a comprehensive public university. Apart from mode of delivery, the characteristics of the course stayed nearly identical throughout. Exam and homework assignment scores are used as measures of performance. Although mean comparisons and basic regressions indicate that online students outperform F2F students on exams, once self-selection is addressed, online students no more outperform F2F students. Furthermore, according to assessments that gauge higher levels of learning, there is evidence that online students underperform compared with F2F students.

引用

页码：175 / 184

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] Teamwork Efficacy and Attitude Differences between Online and Face-to-Face Students
Vance, Kara
Kulturel-Konak, Sadan
Konak, Abdullah
2015 5th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2015, : 246 - 251
[2] Performance Gaps Between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Differences Across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas
Xu, Di
Jaggars, Shanna S.
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 85 (05): : 633 - 659
[3] Differences Between Blended and Face-To-Face Teaching in Students' Perception
de Checchi, Kevin
Bachtold, Manuel
Asensio, Dominique Barbe
Papet, Jacqueline
Roebroeck, Elodie
Huang, Yuanfei
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2024,
[4] An online premium? Characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students in Principles of Microeconomics
Dendir, Seife
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2016, 91 (02) : 59 - 68
[5] Students' Performance in Face-to-Face, Online, and Hybrid Methods of Teaching and Assessment in Anatomy
Albalushi, Halima
Al Mushaiqri, Mohamed
Sirasanagandla, Srinivasa Rao
Das, Srijit
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (20)
[6] No significant distance between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics
Coates, D
Humphreys, BR
Kane, J
Vachris, MA
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2004, 23 (05) : 533 - 546
[7] Evaluating face-to-face and online flipped learning on performance and satisfaction in marketing and communication students
Guevara-Otero, Niurka
Cuevas-Molano, Elena
Vargas-Perez, Ana M.
Rivera, Maria Teresa Sanchez
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 16 (01)
[8] Examining Students' Online Course Perceptions and Comparing Student Performance Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Classrooms
Spencer, Dan
Temple, Traci
ONLINE LEARNING, 2021, 25 (02): : 233 - 261
[9] PhD students' identity construction in face-to-face and online contexts
Seyri, Haniye
Rezaee, Abbas Ali
RESEARCH IN POST-COMPULSORY EDUCATION, 2022, 27 (01) : 48 - 65
[10] Online in face-to-face studying -: A technical game or surplus for students?
Görlitz, G
Grimm, O
Müller, S
8TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL X, PROCEEDINGS: SYSTEMICS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, : 169 - 173

← 1 2 3 4 5 →