Corrosion of silicon integrated circuits and lifetime predictions in implantable electronic devices

被引:70
|
作者
Vanhoestenberghe, A. [1 ]
Donaldson, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Bioengn, Implanted Devices Grp, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
NONHERMETIC ALUMINUM SICS; NEUROLOGICAL PROSTHESES; RELIABILITY EVALUATION; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; FAILURE MECHANISMS; PLASTIC PACKAGES; RUBBER; ENCAPSULANT; HUMIDITY; HERMETICITY;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/031002
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Corrosion is a prime concern for active implantable devices. In this paper we review the principles underlying the concepts of hermetic packages and encapsulation, used to protect implanted electronics, some of which remain widely overlooked. We discuss how technological advances have created a need to update the way we evaluate the suitability of both protection methods. We demonstrate how lifetime predictability is lost for very small hermetic packages and introduce a single parameter to compare different packages, with an equation to calculate the minimum sensitivity required from a test method to guarantee a given lifetime. In the second part of this paper, we review the literature on the corrosion of encapsulated integrated circuits (ICs) and, following a new analysis of published data, we propose an equation for the pre-corrosion lifetime of implanted ICs, and discuss the influence of the temperature, relative humidity, encapsulation and field-strength. As any new protection will be tested under accelerated conditions, we demonstrate the sensitivity of acceleration factors to some inaccurately known parameters. These results are relevant for any application of electronics working in a moist environment. Our comparison of encapsulation and hermetic packages suggests that both concepts may be suitable for future implants.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cybersecurity and cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bryce Alexander
    Adrian Baranchuk
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2020, 17 : 315 - 317
  • [42] Cardiac implantable electronic devices and cybersecurity
    Patel, Bhakti
    Makaryus, Amgad N.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (18) : 69 - 77
  • [43] Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Athletes
    Do, Rose
    Patton, Kristen K.
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 28 (05) : 327 - 336
  • [44] Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Khurrum Khan
    Jitae A. Kim
    Andra Gurgu
    Muzamil Khawaja
    Dragos Cozma
    Mihail G. Chelu
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2022, 36 : 763 - 775
  • [45] Cybersecurity in cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Martignani, Cristian
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (06) : 437 - 444
  • [46] RECYCLING AND TRANSPLANTATION OF IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    TYERS, GFO
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 8 (07) : 683 - 684
  • [47] TACHYCARDIA RECOGNITION BY IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    CAMM, AJ
    DAVIES, DW
    WARD, DE
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (05): : 1175 - 1190
  • [48] MRI and implantable cardiac electronic devices
    Jung, Werner
    Jaeckle, Sebastian
    Zvereva, Vlada
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 30 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [49] Extraction of implantable cardiac electronic devices
    Rickard J.
    Wilkoff B.L.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2011, 13 (5) : 407 - 414
  • [50] Treatment with cardiac electronic implantable devices
    Kuschyk, Juergen
    Sattler, Katherine
    Fastenrath, Fabian
    Rudic, Boris
    Akin, Ibrahim
    HERZ, 2024, 49 (03) : 233 - 246