Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review

被引:576
|
作者
Liu, Hu-Chen [2 ]
Liu, Long [1 ]
Liu, Nan [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Design & Innovat, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[3] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Management, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
关键词
Reliability management; Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk evaluation; Risk priority number; FUZZY INFERENCE; REASONING APPROACH; SYSTEM BEHAVIOR; FMEA; RELIABILITY; METHODOLOGY; DESIGN; PRIORITIZATION; FRAMEWORK; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a risk assessment tool that mitigates potential failures in systems, processes, designs or services and has been used in a wide range of industries. The conventional risk priority number (RPN) method has been criticized to have many deficiencies and various risk priority models have been proposed in the literature to enhance the performance of FMEA. However, there has been no literature review on this topic. In this study, we reviewed 75 FMEA papers published between 1992 and 2012 in the international journals and categorized them according to the approaches used to overcome the limitations of the conventional RPN method. The intention of this review is to address the following three questions: (i) Which shortcomings attract the most attention? (ii) Which approaches are the most popular? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? The answers to these questions will give an indication of current trends in research and the best direction for future research in order to further address the known deficiencies associated with the traditional FMEA. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 838
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
    Huang, Jia
    You, Jian-Xin
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Song, Ming-Shun
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 199
  • [32] Analysis of failure modes, their effects and their criticality in the drug circuit: literature review
    Demers, Emile
    Collin-Levesque, Laurence
    Boule, Marianne
    Lachapelle, Sophie
    Nguyen, Christina
    Lebel, Denis
    Bussieres, Jean-Francois
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2018, 71 (06): : 376 - 384
  • [33] Risk Evaluation Approach in Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of Automotive Headlamp Assembly
    Abdullah, Shukriah
    Aziz, Faieza Abdul
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2014, 564 : 72 - 76
  • [34] Supply chain risk analysis of tempeh using modified failure mode and effects analysis
    Saroyo, P.
    Aulia, F. N.
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURE AND BIOINDUSTRY 2019, 2020, 425
  • [35] Modern Approaches in Credit Risk Modeling: A Literature Review
    Rogojan, Luana Cristina
    Croicu, Andreea Elena
    Iancu, Laura Andreea
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 17 (01): : 1617 - 1627
  • [36] FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS BASED ON THE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    Zamrazilova, Michaela
    Oulehlova, Alena
    [J]. AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (02): : 181 - 185
  • [37] COST-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    Neagoe, Bogdan-Sorin
    [J]. MODTECH 2012: NEW FACE OF T M C R, VOLS I AND II, 2012, : 649 - 652
  • [38] Failure mode and effects analysis: A useful tool for risk identification and injury prevention
    Paparella, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2007, 33 (04) : 367 - 371
  • [39] Evaluating Risk of FLASH Experiments on a Clinical LINAC with Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
    Rahman, M.
    Zhang, R.
    Gladstone, D. J.
    Williams, B. B.
    Chen, E.
    Dexter, C.
    Thompson, L.
    Bruza, P.
    Pogue, B. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E546 - E547
  • [40] Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods
    McElroy, Lisa M.
    Khorzad, Rebeca
    Nannicelli, Anna P.
    Brown, Alexandra R.
    Ladner, Daniela P.
    Holl, Jane L.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (05) : 329 - 336