Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry

被引:85
|
作者
Chen, Shihao [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Jinhai [2 ,3 ]
Wen, Daizong [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Wuhe [2 ,3 ]
Huang, David [4 ]
Wang, Qinmei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Coll, Affiliated Eye Hosp, Sch Optometry & Ophthalmol, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Coll, Hosp Eye, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth PR China, Key Lab Vis Sci, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Ctr Ophthalm Opt & Lasers, Doheny Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
agreement; cornea thickness; optical coherence tomography; repeatability; reproducibility; rotating Scheimpflug imaging; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; ORBSCAN-II; OCULUS PENTACAM; EXTENDED WEAR; CONTACT-LENS; REPEATABILITY; CAMERA; REPRODUCIBILITY; AGREEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01947.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by high-resolution (HR) rotating Scheimpflug imaging and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). CCT measurements were compared to those determined by ultrasound pachymetry (UP). Methods: In 35 healthy eyes, intra-observer repeatability for HR Scheimpflug (Pentacam) and FD-OCT (RTVue) systems was determined in consecutive images taken by an observer in the shortest time possible. Imaging was repeated again by a second observer to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility. The CCT measurements were compared among Scheimpflug, FD-OCT and UP images. Results: Mean coefficients of repeatability were 0.48% for Scheimpflug and 0.26% for FD-OCT. For Scheimpflug, the coefficient of inter-operator reproducibility was 0.87%. For FD-OCT, the coefficient of inter-operator reproducibility was 0.45%. The CCT measurements by Scheimpflug, OCT and UP images were (mean +/- standard deviation) 521.7 +/- 27.6 mu m, 510.8 +/- 28.6 mu m and 516.5 +/- 27.6 mu m, respectively. The differences between instruments were statistically significant. The 95% limits of agreement in CCT were -0.7 to 22.5 mu m for Pentacam-OCT, -13.4 to 24.0 mu m for Pentacam-UP and -26.7 to 15.4 mu m for OCT-UP. There was a high degree of correlation between CCT measured by all 3 methods. Conclusion: Noncontact measurements of CCT with HR Scheimpflug and FD-OCT systems yielded excellent repeatability and reproducibility and can be used interchangeably. Although both devices were comparable with UP; in clinical practice, the measurements acquired by optical modalities are not directly interchangeable with UP measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 455
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry
    Grewal, Dilraj S.
    Brar, Gagandeep S.
    Grewal, Satinder P. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (06): : 954 - 964
  • [22] High-resolution retinal imaging in young children using a handheld scanner and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography
    Gerth, Christina
    Zawadzki, Robert J.
    Heon, Elise
    Werner, John S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2009, 13 (01): : 72 - 74
  • [23] Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus
    Sorkin, Nir
    Ohri, Anamika
    Jung, Hyejung
    Haines, Lacey
    Sorbara, Luigina
    Mimouni, Michael
    Singal, Neera
    Hatch, Wendy
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 105 (10) : 1371 - 1375
  • [24] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography
    Wongchaisuwat, Nida
    Metheetrairat, Ankana
    Chonpimai, Pratuangsri
    Nujoi, Waree
    Prabhasawat, Pinnita
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 12 : 1865 - 1873
  • [25] Corneal Power Measurement Obtained by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Comparison With Scheimpflug and Automated Keratometry Measurements
    Wang, Qinmei
    Hua, Yanjun
    Savini, Giacomo
    Chen, Hao
    Bao, Fangjun
    Lin, Shishi
    Lu, Weicong
    Huang, Jinhai
    [J]. CORNEA, 2015, 34 (10) : 1266 - 1271
  • [26] Corneal Thickness in Keratoconus Comparing Optical, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography Pachymetry
    Dutta, Debarun
    Rao, Harsha L.
    Addepalli, Uday K.
    Vaddavalli, Pravin K.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [27] Comparison of Corneal Thickness Measurements After Customized Corneal Crosslinking Using High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography and Scheimpflug Tomography
    Baiao, Tiago Mendes
    Wendelstein, Jascha
    Seiler, Theo G.
    [J]. CORNEA, 2023, 42 (09) : 1104 - 1109
  • [28] Macular thickness of Chinese with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography
    Yu Weihong
    Zheng Lin
    Dai Rongping
    Zhang Zhiqiao
    Dong Fangtian
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2011, 89 (01) : E104 - E105
  • [29] Comparison of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasonic Pachymetry for Assessment of Central Corneal Thickness
    Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk
    Mirza, G. Ertugrul
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04): : 259 - 262
  • [30] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera
    Gonul, Saban
    Koktekir, Bengu Ekinci
    Bakbak, Berker
    Gedik, Sansal
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2014, 77 (06) : 345 - 350