Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry

被引:85
|
作者
Chen, Shihao [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Jinhai [2 ,3 ]
Wen, Daizong [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Wuhe [2 ,3 ]
Huang, David [4 ]
Wang, Qinmei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Coll, Affiliated Eye Hosp, Sch Optometry & Ophthalmol, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Coll, Hosp Eye, Wenzhou 325027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth PR China, Key Lab Vis Sci, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Ctr Ophthalm Opt & Lasers, Doheny Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
agreement; cornea thickness; optical coherence tomography; repeatability; reproducibility; rotating Scheimpflug imaging; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; ORBSCAN-II; OCULUS PENTACAM; EXTENDED WEAR; CONTACT-LENS; REPEATABILITY; CAMERA; REPRODUCIBILITY; AGREEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01947.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by high-resolution (HR) rotating Scheimpflug imaging and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). CCT measurements were compared to those determined by ultrasound pachymetry (UP). Methods: In 35 healthy eyes, intra-observer repeatability for HR Scheimpflug (Pentacam) and FD-OCT (RTVue) systems was determined in consecutive images taken by an observer in the shortest time possible. Imaging was repeated again by a second observer to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility. The CCT measurements were compared among Scheimpflug, FD-OCT and UP images. Results: Mean coefficients of repeatability were 0.48% for Scheimpflug and 0.26% for FD-OCT. For Scheimpflug, the coefficient of inter-operator reproducibility was 0.87%. For FD-OCT, the coefficient of inter-operator reproducibility was 0.45%. The CCT measurements by Scheimpflug, OCT and UP images were (mean +/- standard deviation) 521.7 +/- 27.6 mu m, 510.8 +/- 28.6 mu m and 516.5 +/- 27.6 mu m, respectively. The differences between instruments were statistically significant. The 95% limits of agreement in CCT were -0.7 to 22.5 mu m for Pentacam-OCT, -13.4 to 24.0 mu m for Pentacam-UP and -26.7 to 15.4 mu m for OCT-UP. There was a high degree of correlation between CCT measured by all 3 methods. Conclusion: Noncontact measurements of CCT with HR Scheimpflug and FD-OCT systems yielded excellent repeatability and reproducibility and can be used interchangeably. Although both devices were comparable with UP; in clinical practice, the measurements acquired by optical modalities are not directly interchangeable with UP measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 455
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Central Corneal Thickness Measurements With Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasonic Pachymetry and Rotating Scheimpflug Camera
    Ishibazawa, Akihiro
    Igarashi, Sho
    Hanada, Kazuomi
    Nagaoka, Taiji
    Ishiko, Satoshi
    Ito, Haruna
    Yoshida, Akitoshi
    [J]. CORNEA, 2011, 30 (06) : 615 - 619
  • [2] Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease
    Hoehn, A. L.
    Thomasy, S. M.
    Kass, P. H.
    Horikawa, T.
    Samuel, M.
    Shull, O. R.
    Stewart, K. A.
    Murphy, C. J.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 242 : 59 - 66
  • [3] Corneal power measurement with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography
    Tang, Maolong
    Chen, Alex
    Li, Yan
    Huang, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (12): : 2115 - 2122
  • [4] Comparative Study of Central Corneal Thickness Using Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
    Garcia-Medina, Jose J.
    Garcia-Medina, Manuel
    Garcia-Maturana, Carlos
    Zanon-Moreno, Vicente
    Pons-Vazquez, Sheila
    Pinazo-Duran, Maria D.
    [J]. CORNEA, 2013, 32 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [5] Corneal epithelial thickness measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography
    Wang, Ting
    Li, Fengjie
    Wang, Shuting
    Shi, Weiyun
    [J]. SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2016, 30 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [6] Assessment of corneal thickness measurement using swept-source Fourier-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug camera
    Huang, Jinhai
    Feng, Yifan
    Wang, Qinmei
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (07): : 1305 - 1306
  • [7] High-Resolution Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Subretinal Cysticercosis
    Sinha, Subijay
    Takkar, Brijesh
    Venkatesh, Pradeep
    Khanduja, Sumeet
    [J]. RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2012, 32 (03): : 643 - 644
  • [8] Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thickness measurements with scanning-slit, Scheimpflug and Fourier-domain ocular coherence tomography
    Randleman, J. Bradley
    Lynn, Michael J.
    Perez-Straziota, Claudia E.
    Weissman, Heather M.
    Kim, Sang Woo
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 99 (09) : 1176 - 1181
  • [9] Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry
    Barkana, Y
    Gerber, Y
    Elbaz, U
    Schwartz, S
    Ken-Dror, G
    Avni, I
    Zadok, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (09): : 1729 - 1735
  • [10] Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease (vol 242, pg 59, 2018)
    Hoehn, A. L.
    Thomasy, S. M.
    Kass, P. H.
    Horikawa, T.
    Samuel, M.
    Shull, O. R.
    Stewart, K. A.
    Murphy, C. J.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2020, 262