Assessing user-specific difficulty of documents

被引:2
|
作者
Paukkeri, Mari-Sanna [1 ]
Ollikainen, Marja [1 ]
Honkela, Timo [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ Sch Sci, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Difficulty measure; User modelling; Readability; Keyphrase extraction; TEXT READABILITY; INFORMATION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2012.04.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
On the web, a huge variety of text collections contain knowledge in different expertise domains, such as technology or medicine. The texts are written for different uses and thus for people having different levels of expertise on the domain. Texts intended for professionals may not be understandable at all by a lay person, and texts for lay people may not contain all the detailed information needed by a professional. Many information retrieval applications, such as search engines, would offer better user experience if they were able to select the text sources that best fit the expertise level of the user. In this article, we propose a novel approach for assessing the difficulty level of a document: our method assesses difficulty for each user separately. The method enables, for instance, offering information in a personalised manner based on the user's knowledge of different domains. The method is based on the comparison of terms appearing in a document and terms known by the user. We present two ways to collect information about the terminology the user knows: by directly asking the users the difficulty of terms or, as a novel automatic approach, indirectly by analysing texts written by the users. We examine the applicability of the methodology with text documents in the medical domain. The results show that the method is able to distinguish between documents written for lay people and documents written for experts. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 212
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADAPTATION OF MATHEMATICAL DOCUMENTS Exploring Document Structures, Metadata, and Context for the Generation of User-specific Documents
    Muller, Christine
    [J]. KMIS 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SHARING, 2010, : 143 - 148
  • [2] User-Specific Perspectives on Ontologies
    Brochhausen, Mathias
    Slaughter, Laura
    Stenzhorn, Holger
    Graf, Norbert
    [J]. MEDICAL AND CARE COMPUNETICS 6, 2010, 156 : 114 - 121
  • [3] USER-SPECIFIC WATER DEMAND ELASTICITIES
    SCHNEIDER, ML
    WHITLATCH, EE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1991, 117 (01): : 52 - 73
  • [4] User-specific tool for project management
    不详
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1998, 77 (12): : 29 - 29
  • [5] REPUTATIONAL RATING AND USER-SPECIFIC CONSENT
    Toscano, Gabriele
    [J]. REVISTA BOLIVIANA DE DERECHO, 2023, (36) : 46 - 55
  • [6] Evaluating the importance of user-specific profiling
    Wang, Z
    Rubin, N
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND USENIX WINDOWS NT SYMPOSIUM, 1998, : 21 - 30
  • [7] Exploring User-Specific Information in Music Retrieval
    Cheng, Zhiyong
    Shen, Jialie
    Nie, Liqiang
    Chua, Tat-Seng
    Kankanhalli, Mohan
    [J]. SIGIR'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2017, : 655 - 664
  • [8] Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system
    Jain, AK
    Ross, A
    [J]. 2002 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 57 - 60
  • [9] User-Specific Parameterization of Process Monitoring Systems
    B. Denkena
    H. Klemme
    J. Becker
    H. Blech
    [J]. Production Engineering, 2022, 16 : 735 - 742
  • [10] Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps
    Meyer, V.
    Kuhlicke, C.
    Luther, J.
    Fuchs, S.
    Priest, S.
    Dorner, W.
    Serrhini, K.
    Pardoe, J.
    McCarthy, S.
    Seidel, J.
    Palka, G.
    Unnerstall, H.
    Viavattene, C.
    Scheuer, S.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (05) : 1701 - 1716