Developing an Improved Statistical Approach for Survival Estimation in Bone Metastases Management: The Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival (BMETS) Model

被引:27
|
作者
Alcorn, Sara R. [1 ]
Fiksel, Jacob [2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ]
Elledge, Christen R. [1 ]
Smith, Thomas J. [3 ]
Perng, Powell [1 ]
Saleemi, Sarah [1 ]
McNutt, Todd R. [1 ]
DeWeese, Theodore L. [1 ]
Zeger, Scott [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Radiat Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PALLIATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; CANCER-PATIENTS; RANDOM FORESTS; PROGNOSIS; COUNTS; INDEX; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether a machine learning approach optimizes survival estimation for patients with symptomatic bone metastases (SBM), we developed the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival (BMETS) to predict survival using 27 prognostic covariates. To establish its relative clinical utility, we compared BMETS with 2 simpler Cox regression models used in this setting. Methods and Materials: For 492 bone sites in 397 patients evaluated for palliative radiation therapy (RT) for SBM from January 2007 to January 2013, data for 27 clinical variables were collected. These covariates and the primary outcome of time from consultation to death were used to build BMETS using random survival forests. We then performed Cox regressions as per 2 validated models: Chow's 3-item (C-3) and Westhoff's 2-item (W-2) tools. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation procedures and measured by time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC) for all 3 models. For temporal validation, a separate data set comprised of 104 bone sites treated in 85 patients in 2018 was used to estimate tAUC from BMETS. Results: Median survival was 6.4 months. Variable importance was greatest for performance status, blood cell counts, recent systemic therapy type, and receipt of concurrent nonbone palliative RT. tAUC at 3, 6, and 12 months was 0.83, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively, suggesting excellent discrimination of BMETS across postconsultation time points. BMETS outperformed simpler models at each time, with respective tAUC at each time of 0.78, 0.76, and 0.74 for the C-3 model and 0.80, 0.78, and 0.77 for the W-2 model. For the temporal validation set, respective tAUC was similarly high at 0.86, 0.82, and 0.78. Conclusions: For patients with SBM, BMETS improved survival predictions versus simpler traditional models. Model performance was maintained when applied to a temporal validation set. To facilitate clinical use, we developed a web platform for data entry and display of BMETS-predicted survival probabilities. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 563
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictive model for survival in patients having repeat radiation treatment for painful bone metastases
    Chow, Edward
    Ding, Keyue
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Wong, Rebecca K. S.
    van der Linden, Yvette M.
    Roos, Daniel
    Hartsell, William F.
    Hoskin, Peter
    Wu, Jackson S. Y.
    Nabid, Abdenour
    Leer, Jan Willem
    Vonk, Ernest
    Babington, Scott
    Demas, William F.
    Wilson, Carolyn F.
    Brundage, Michael
    Zhu, Liting
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 (03) : 547 - 551
  • [32] Validation of a RPA prognostic model to predict overall survival in patients treated with bone metastases
    Giaretta, S.
    Von Eyben, R.
    Usoz, M.
    Aggarwal, S.
    Chang, D. T.
    Kidd, E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E440 - E440
  • [33] Normalization of bone markers is associated with improved survival in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and elevated bone resorption receiving zoledronic acid
    Lipton, Allan
    Cook, Richard
    Saad, Fred
    Major, Pierre
    Garnero, Patrick
    Terpos, Evangelos
    Brown, Janet E.
    Coleman, Robert E.
    CANCER, 2008, 113 (01) : 193 - 201
  • [34] An algorithm model for management of bone metastases and associated pain
    Blum, RH
    Bhatia, A
    Fleishman, S
    Portenoy, R
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2005, 20 : P10 - P10
  • [35] The Prediction of Survival after Surgical Management of Bone Metastases of the Extremities-A Comparison of Prognostic Models
    Ben Gal, Ofir
    Soh, Terrence Chi Fang
    Vaughan, Sarah
    Jayasanker, Viswanath
    Mahendra, Ashish
    Gupta, Sanjay
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (07) : 4703 - 4716
  • [36] Independent Validation of a Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach Predicting Survival After Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases
    Nieder, Carsten
    Mannsaker, Bard
    Yobuta, Rosalba
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (03) : 1471 - 1474
  • [37] PROLONGED SURVIVAL IN NEUROBLASTOMA WITH MULTIPLE SKELETAL METASTASES AND BONE MARROW INFILTRATION
    MCGOLDRI.KE
    LANZKOWS.P
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1970, 59 (06): : 711 - &
  • [38] Comparison of survival prediction models for bone metastases of the extremities following surgery
    Park, J. H.
    Won, J.
    Kim, H-s.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, S.
    Han, I.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (02): : 203 - 211
  • [39] Survival prediction in geriatric patients after radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases
    Bostel, T.
    Sprave, T.
    Foerster, R.
    Schlampp, I.
    Akbaba, S.
    Wollschlaeger, D.
    Debus, J.
    Mayer, A.
    Schmidberger, H.
    Rief, H.
    Nicolay, N. H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S667 - S667
  • [40] Lung and bone metastases patterns in osteosarcoma: Chemotherapy improves overall survival
    Tang, Liyuan
    Liu, Binbin
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (04) : E32692