A deliverable four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator tumor tracking delivery

被引:28
|
作者
Suh, Yelin [1 ,2 ]
Weiss, Elisabeth [2 ]
Zhong, Hualiang [2 ]
Fatyga, Mirek [2 ]
Siebers, Jeffrey V. [2 ]
Keall, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
lung cancer; IMRT; 4D CT; DMLC tracking;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a deliverable four-dimensional (41)) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) tumor tracking delivery. Methods and Materials: The deliverable 4D IMRT planning method involves aligning MLC leaf motion parallel to the major axis of target motion and translating MLC leaf positions by the difference in the target centroid position between respiratory phases of the 4D CT scan. This method ignores nonlinear respiratory motion and deformation. A three-dimensional (3D) optimal method whereby an IMRT plan on each respiratory phase of the 4D CT scan was independently optimized was used for comparison. For 12 lung cancer patient 4D CT scans, individual phase plans and deformable dose-summed 4D plans using the two methods were created and compared. Results: For each of the individual phase plans, the deliverable method yielded similar isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms. The deliverable and 3D optimal methods yielded statistically equivalent dose-volume metrics for both individual phase plans and 4D plans (p > 0.05 for all metrics compared). The deliverable method was affected by 4D CT artifacts in one case. Both methods were affected by high vector field variations from deformable registration. Conclusions: The deliverable method yielded similar dose distributions for each of the individual phase plans and statistically equivalent dosimetric values compared with the 3D optimal method, indicating that the deliverable method is dosimetrically robust to the variations of fractional time spent in respiratory phases on a given 4D CT scan. Nonlinear target motion and deformation did not cause significant dose discrepancies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1526 / 1536
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung cancer: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, four-dimensional Imaging and mobility management
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Senan, Suresh
    [J]. IMRT, IGRT, SBRT: ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2007, 40 : 239 - 252
  • [22] Three-Dimensional Versus Four-Dimensional Dose Calculation for Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Chung, J. H.
    Chun, M.
    Kim, J. I.
    Park, J. M.
    Shin, K. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E321 - E322
  • [23] Three-dimensional versus four-dimensional dose calculation for breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Chung, Joo-Hyun
    Chun, Minsoo
    Kim, Jung-In
    Park, Jong Min
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1110):
  • [24] INTEGRATION OF REAL-TIME INTERNAL ELECTROMAGNETIC POSITION MONITORING COUPLED WITH DYNAMIC MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR TRACKING: AN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Smith, Ryan L.
    Sawant, Amit
    Santanam, Lakshmi
    Venkat, Raghu B.
    Newell, Laurence J.
    Cho, Byung-chul
    Poulsen, Per
    Catell, Herbert
    Keall, Paul J.
    Parikh, Parag J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 868 - 875
  • [25] Development and commissioning of a multileaf collimator model in Monte Carlo dose calculations for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Jang, SY
    Vassiliev, ON
    Liu, HH
    Mohan, R
    Siebers, JV
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 770 - 781
  • [26] Determination of depth and field size dependence of multileaf collimator transmission in intensity-modulated radiation therapy beams
    Zygmanski, Piotr
    Rosca, Florin
    Kadam, Dnyanesh
    Lorenz, Friedlieb
    Nalichowski, Adrian
    Court, Laurence
    Chin, Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (04): : 76 - 95
  • [27] Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator
    Webb, S
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (02): : 241 - 260
  • [28] Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Popple, Richard A.
    Fiveash, John B.
    Brezovich, Ivan A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (10) : 3752 - 3759
  • [29] A method of simulating dynamic multileaf collimators using Monte Carlo techniques for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Liu, HH
    Verhaegen, F
    Dong, L
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (09): : 2283 - 2298
  • [30] Four-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Zhao, Kuai-le
    Guerrero, Thomas M.
    Mcguire, Sean E.
    Yaremko, Brian
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Cox, James D.
    Hui, Zhouguang
    Li, Yupeng
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    Mohan, Radhe
    Liao, Zhongxing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : 278 - 287