Screening of serum protein biomarkers in hemorrhagic cerebral infarction by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) technology

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Zongqiang [1 ]
Wen, Lina [2 ]
Feng, Linlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Xiaotangshan Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Shijitan Hosp, Clin Nutr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS); hemorrhagic cerebral infarction (HCI); protein biomarkers; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; POTENTIAL BIOMARKERS; TRANSFORMATION; THROMBOLYSIS;
D O I
10.21037/atm-20-6071
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Serum samples of patients with hemorrhagic cerebral infarction (HCI), cerebral infarction (CI), and healthy controls (HCs) were used to screen statistically different protein peaks as potential biomarkers and to establish a decision tree classification model. Methods: The serum samples from clinically confirmed patients with HCI and CI from November 2018 to October 2019 were collected, along with those of HCs who visited our hospital during the same period. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) with CM10 ProteinChip was used to analyze the differences in serum protein expression profiles of 30 patients with HCI, 32 patients with CI, and 31 HCs in the training group, and a decision tree classification model was established. At the same time, the blind test group (18 patients with HCI, 21 patients with CI, and 17 HCs) was tested by a blind method. Results: Model 1 was successfully established by software analysis with a mass-to-charge ratio of 3,495.2, 8,941.0, and 15,890.4 as a differential protein peak. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of model 1 in distinguishing HCI from HCs were 86.8%, 87.1%, and 86.9%, respectively. After verification of model 1 by the blind test group, the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.9%, 94.1%, and 91.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of model 2 with a mass-to-charge ratio of 2,941.3 as a differential protein peak were 86.7%, 75.0%, and 80.6%, respectively. After verification of model 2 by the blind test group, the results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 90.4%, and 87.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDITOF-MS) and CM10 ProteinChip can be used to screen serum protein markers in patients with HCI. Massto-charge ratio of 3,495.2, 8,941.0, 15,890.4, and 2,941.3 may be potential protein biomarkers of HCI and used to distinguish HCI patients from HCs and CI.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Relationship Between Serum Protein Profiles and Lung Cancer by SELDI-TOF-MS (Surface Enhanced Laser Desabsorbtion Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry) Method
    Yurdakul, A. Selim
    Sonmez, Ozlem
    Simsek, Cebrail
    Zengin, Nurullah
    Keyf, Atilla Ihsan
    Ozturk, Can
    Oksuzoglu, O. Berna
    Kubilay, Dilek
    Gulbahar, Ozlem Z.
    Karatayli, Senem Ceren Ozen
    Bozdayi, A. Mithat
    TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1084 - 1089
  • [32] Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry serum protein profiling to identify nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Ho, David Wing Yuen
    Yang, Zhen Fan
    Wong, Birgitta Yee-Hang
    Kwong, Dora Lai-Wan
    Sham, Jonathan Shun-Tong
    Wei, William Ignace
    Yuen, Anthony Po Wing
    CANCER, 2006, 107 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [33] Quality control and quality assessment of data from surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) time-of flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS)
    Hong, HX
    Dragan, Y
    Epstein, J
    Teitel, C
    Chen, BZ
    Xie, Q
    Fang, H
    Shi, LM
    Perkins, R
    Tong, WD
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 6 (Suppl 2)
  • [34] Quality control and quality assessment of data from surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) time-of flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS)
    Huixiao Hong
    Yvonne Dragan
    Joshua Epstein
    Candee Teitel
    Bangzheng Chen
    Qian Xie
    Hong Fang
    Leming Shi
    Roger Perkins
    Weida Tong
    BMC Bioinformatics, 6
  • [35] Desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS): A novel proteomic approach to identify bladder cancer biomarkers.
    Vlahou, A
    Mendrinos, S
    Kondylis, F
    Schellhammer, PF
    Lynch, DF
    Wright, GL
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 1999, 5 : 3867S - 3867S
  • [36] Urine protein profiling with surface-enhanced laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Schaub, S
    Wilkins, J
    Weiler, T
    Sangster, K
    Rush, D
    Nickerson, P
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 65 (01) : 323 - 332
  • [37] Effect of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry on identifying biomarkers of laryngeal carcinoma
    Liu, Chibo
    Pan, Chunqin
    Wang, Haibao
    Yong, Liang
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (06) : 1139 - 1145
  • [38] Differences in protein profiles of the isolates of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) ProteinChip assays
    Asao Makioka
    Masahiro Kumagai
    Seiki Kobayashi
    Tsutomu Takeuchi
    Parasitology Research, 2007, 102 : 103 - 110
  • [39] Differences in protein profiles of the isolates of Entamoeba histolytica and E-dispar by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) ProteinChip assays
    Makioka, Asao
    Kumagai, Masahiro
    Kobayashi, Seiki
    Takeuchi, Tsutomu
    PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH, 2007, 102 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [40] Use of surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI TOF MS) to differentiate Francisella tularensis subspecies
    Seibold, E.
    Bogumil, R.
    Vorderwuelbecke, S.
    Splettstoesser, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 296 : 158 - 158