DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DISTANCE AND FACE TO FACE LEARNING

被引:0
|
作者
Rosa Frontera, M. [1 ]
Jimenez, Alvaro [2 ]
Lavin, Jose M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecnol Indoamer, Quito, Ecuador
[2] Univ Tecn Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador
[3] Ctr Univ CESINE, Santander, Spain
关键词
Learning; Face-to-face Education; Distance Education; Ecuador; University dropouts;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
New technologies are increasingly applied to the educational field thanks to the creation of different cybernetic supports and programs that allow instant or deferred communication between teachers and students. This has meant the emergence of online or distance modalities within universities as an option for those who do not always have the possibility to invest their time in the study of a career. This article is based on finding the differences between the distance and face-to-face modalities. Variables are analyzed, such as the opinion of professors and students; attendance at virtual or face-to-face presentations; how is the process in terms of the delivery of work or tasks; if there is a difference in the final grades; or how the student-teacher feedback is, all in a qualitative and quantitative way according to the indicator, and establishing these variables as criteria to evaluate the educational performance of each one of them. Another factor that has been analyzed in this study is whether there is a difference in the evaluative criteria at the institutional level in both modalities due to the inherent characteristics within each of them. It has also been taken into account what factors students have considered to choose one modality or another and if this has had an influence on their performance and development throughout the course. To this end, students and professors of the Universidad Tecnologica Indoamerica in Law have been interviewed, both in face-to-face and distance learning. The results provide different perspectives according to one modality or another in which both advantages and disadvantages can be found.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2547 / 2555
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences between face-to-face and synchronous distance learning on cognitive, behavioural and affective outcomes
    Laronze, Florian
    Nkaoua, Bernard
    OPEN LEARNING, 2024,
  • [2] The integration of distance learning via internet and face to face learning: Why face to face learning is required in distance learning via internet?
    Marsap, A.
    Narin, M.
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - NEW TRENDS AND ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, 1 (01): : 2871 - 2878
  • [3] Blended learning and the convergence of face-to-face and distance education
    Garcia Aretio, Lorenzo
    RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2018, 21 (01): : 9 - 22
  • [4] Differences between high and low performers in face recognition in electrophysiological correlates of face familiarity and distance-to-norm
    Schroeger, Anna
    Ficco, Linda
    Wuttke, Stella J.
    Kaufmann, Juergen M.
    Schweinberger, Stefan R.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 182
  • [5] Deep learning for face recognition at a distance
    Guei, Axel-Christian
    Akhloufi, Moulay A.
    DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 10652
  • [6] COMBINING DISTANCE AND FACE-TO-FACE TEACHING AND LEARNING IN SPATIAL COMPUTATIONS
    Gulland, Elizabeth-Kate
    Schut, A. G. T.
    Veenendaal, Bert
    ISPRS WORKSHOP COMMISSIONS VI/1 - VI/2 E-LEARNING 2011 WITHIN ACRS, 2011, 38-6 (W27): : 23 - 28
  • [7] Distance or Face-to-Face Education for Language Learning: A Case of English
    Akaslan, Dursun
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2019, : 80 - 85
  • [8] FACE TO FACE - PROXIMITY AND DISTANCE
    ABERCROMBIE, ML
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1971, 15 (04) : 395 - +
  • [9] Face to face with distance education
    Deeson, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 29 (03) : 283 - 284
  • [10] Teachers' memories: trajectory of the transition from face-to-face to distance learning
    Moroni, Alexandre
    Gomes Graebin, Cleusa Maria
    Vargas Mangan, Patricia Kayser
    CONHECIMENTO & DIVERSIDADE, 2021, 13 (29): : 134 - 149