Naturalizing Critical Thinking: Consequences for Education, Blueprint for Future Research in Cognitive Science

被引:8
|
作者
Pasquinelli, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Farina, Mathieu [1 ]
Bedel, Audrey [3 ]
Casati, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Main Pate, Paris, France
[2] PSL Univ, CNRS, EHESS, Inst Jean Nicod,Dept Etud Cognit ENS, Paris, France
[3] Ecole Prat Hautes Etud, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/mbe.12286
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While very popular in public discourse about education, critical thinking education is still a work in progress. Two key conditions for successfully addressing critical thinking education are lacking: (a) the availability of a clear, specific, and operational definition, and (b) a deeper understanding of the natural cognitive bases of critical thinking. We, therefore, propose a theoretical framework for critical thinking education, grounded on a cognitive approach. Starting from a restrictive characterization of critical thinking-defined as the capacity of evaluating the epistemic quality of information, and of calibrating one's confidence in relationship to it-we identify specific mechanisms subserving critical thinking that are present in early human development. We refer to these mechanisms as the natural building blocks of critical thinking. On this naturalistic ground, effective educational strategies can be envisaged that both harness the natural building blocks of critical thinking and help overcome its shortcomings.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 176
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical thinking and science education
    Bailin S.
    [J]. Science & Education, 2002, 11 (4) : 361 - 375
  • [2] Philosophy of Science, Critical Thinking and Science Education
    Peter Davson-Galle
    [J]. Science & Education, 2004, 13 (6) : 503 - 517
  • [3] CRITICAL THINKING AND SCIENCE-EDUCATION
    BYRNE, MS
    JOHNSTONE, AH
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1987, 12 (03) : 325 - 339
  • [4] Critical Thinking Environments for Science Education
    Woolf, Beverly Park
    Murray, Tom
    Marshall, David
    Dragon, Toby
    Kohler, Kevin
    Mattingly, Matt
    Bruno, Merle
    Murray, Dan
    Sammons, Jim
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: SUPPORTING LEARNING THROUGH INTELLIGENT AND SOCIALLY INFORMED TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 125 : 702 - 709
  • [5] THE RATIONALITY OF SCIENCE, CRITICAL THINKING, AND SCIENCE-EDUCATION
    SIEGEL, H
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 1989, 80 (01) : 9 - 41
  • [6] A case for critical constructivism and critical thinking in science education
    Watts M.
    Jofili Z.
    Bezerra R.
    [J]. Research in Science Education, 1997, 27 (2) : 309 - 322
  • [7] COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF TECHNOLOGY IN SCIENCE-EDUCATION
    YEANY, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1987, 24 (04) : 287 - 287
  • [8] Computational Thinking in Archival Science Research and Education
    Underwood, William
    Marciano, Richard
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 3146 - 3152
  • [9] Future research in cognitive science and religion
    Bulkeley, K
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2004, 27 (06) : 733 - +
  • [10] Standard-based science education and critical thinking
    Forawi, Sufian A.
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2016, 20 : 52 - 62