The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology

被引:69
|
作者
Wong, Kit Man [1 ]
Capasso, Anna [1 ]
Eckhardt, S. Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dev Therapeut Program, Canc Ctr,Div Med Oncol,Dept Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; MOLECULARLY TARGETED AGENTS; DOSE-LIMITING TOXICITY; DESIGN TASK-FORCE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; ADVANCED MELANOMA; BREAST-CANCER; OPEN-LABEL;
D O I
10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.194
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Advances in our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer have led to increased interest in molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), which target specific oncogenic drivers and are now a major focus of cancer drug development. MTAs differ from traditional cytotoxic agents in various aspects, including their toxicity profiles and the potential availability of predictive biomarkers of response. The landscape of phase I oncology trials is evolving to adapt to these novel therapies and to improve the efficiency of drug development. In this Review, we discuss new strategies used in phase I trial design, such as novel dose-escalation schemes to circumvent limitations of the classic 3 + 3 design and enable faster dose escalation and/or more-precise dose determinations using statistical modelling; improved selection of patients based on genetic or molecular biomarkers; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses; and the early evaluation of efficacy-in addition to safety. Indeed, new expedited approval pathways that can accelerate drug development require demonstration of efficacy in early phase trials. The application of molecular tumour profiling for matched therapy and the testing of drug combinations based on a strong biological rationale are also increasingly seen in phase I studies. Finally, the shift towards multi-institutional trials and centralized study management results in consequent implications for institutions and investigators. These issues are also highlighted herein.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The changing landscape of urologic oncology: Initiating systemic therapies, interventional skills, and clinical trials Introduction
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Shore, Neal D.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (04) : S1 - S1
  • [42] The changing landscape of clinical trials in Australia
    Seidler, Anna Lene
    Willson, Melina L.
    Aberoumand, Mason
    Williams, Jonathan G.
    Hunter, Kylie E.
    Barba, Angie
    Simes, R. John
    Webster, Angela
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2023, 219 (05) : 192 - 196
  • [43] Keeping phase III tuberculosis trials relevant: Adapting to a rapidly changing landscape
    Phillips, Patrick P. J.
    Mitnick, Carole D.
    Neaton, James D.
    Nahid, Payam
    Lienhardt, Christian
    Nunn, Andrew J.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (03)
  • [44] The changing radiation oncology landscape in New Zealand
    James, Melissa
    Munro, Philip L.
    Adams, Gerard
    Keogh, Sandra
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 66 (05) : 694 - 700
  • [45] Dose-finding with two agents in phase I oncology trials
    Thall, PF
    Millikan, RE
    Mueller, P
    Lee, SJ
    BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (03) : 487 - 496
  • [46] Clinical outcome and survival of patients participating in oncology phase I trials
    Florescu, A.
    Chau, N. G.
    Chan, K. K.
    Wang, L.
    Chen, E. X.
    Oza, A. M.
    Siu, L. L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [47] Health care disparity: An overlooked problem in phase I oncology trials
    Rockwell, Lindsay E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (21) : 3182 - 3183
  • [49] TARGETED THERAPIES Redefining the primary objective of phase I oncology trials
    Ratain, Mark J.
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) : 503 - 504
  • [50] Dose-escalation models for combination phase I trials in oncology
    Hamberg, Paul
    Ratain, Mark J.
    Lesaffre, Emmanuel
    Verweij, Jaap
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (16) : 2870 - 2878